Posts Tagged ‘still’

WSMV: Sen. Harper still inspires after two decades in office

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

Click on the link below to see the video.

A pioneering Tennessee lawmaker says she is only walking in the footsteps of those who came to serve before her.

While serving near the bust of Samson Keeble, Tennessee’s first black lawmaker, Sen. Thelma Harper, D-Nashville, knows it’s on his and others’ shoulders she stands.

“I know that I’m where I am because of people like Avon Williams and many others who are here now,” Harper said.

In 1991, Harper made history herself, when she became the first black woman elected to Tennessee’s Senate.

via TN lawmaker still inspires after two decades in office – WSMV Channel 4.

 

TNDP News

Corrected Pueblo County inactive voter figures still high

Friday, November 4th, 2011

New tallies released by Pueblo County Clerk Bo Ortiz on Thursday put the percentage of “inactive voters” who returned ballots this year at 1,791 or nearly 11 percent of county voters. That’s a gain of nearly 5 percentage points from 2009 and well above the previous statewide 3 percent average.

“A press release issued October 31 by this office contained a mistake in the reporting of the Inactive Failed to Vote tabulations,” Ortiz wrote in a release. “The correct number of IFTV was 1791, which is 10.9 percent turnout, and still above the statewide average.”

In his October 31 release, Ortiz touted an exceptionally large percentage of inactive voters ballots cast. He said the figures suggested inactive voters were accounting for 28 percent of the vote.

“That was just human error. It just happened when we were pulling the extract[ed numbers ] into Excel,” Ortiz told the Colorado Independent, referring to the popular accounting software program.

Regardless of the mistake in the Pueblo Clerk’s office, tallies from the secretary of state’s office demonstrate that inactive voters played a major role in this week’s election, accounting for roughly 5.5 percent of the total votes cast in the state.

“I can say that mailing ballots to inactive voters is the right thing for Pueblo County,” Ortiz said. “We’re used to it here. People expect their ballots and I want to keep that consistent.”

Ortiz told the Independent weeks ago that he believes his main objective as clerk is to expand participation in elections, and today he said he was proud of the fact that, in effect, inactive voters in Pueblo County got to voice their concerns and opinions twice: when the candidates and their supporters knocked on their doors and when they returned their ballots to cast their votes.

The numbers of inactive voter ballots cast is a topic of special interest in Colorado this year because Secretary of State Scott Gessler, elected to office last November, attempted to prevent counties from mailing ballots to inactive voters, upending a practice that has been ongoing for roughly five years, as the state moves increasingly toward mail-in elections.

Inactive voters are legally registered voters who have, for whatever reason, failed to cast ballots in the previous general election. Inactive voters tend to be citizens who move often or have limited access to the internet, for example, and include mostly minority voters, youth and elderly voters and people with limited resources.

Ortiz and other county clerks battled against Gessler’s new interpretation of state election law when he brought it out. Ortiz argued that Gessler’s order would force him to violate the federal Uniform Military and Overseas Voters Act, which obligates county clerks to send ballots to all eligible voters in the military, active and inactive.

Gessler was unmoved by the argument. He sued Denver County to stop Clerk Debra Johnson from mailing out ballots to inactive voters. The district court judge hearing the case, however, ruled against Gessler and denied his request for an injunction against the county. A ruling on Gessler’s interpretation of state law is expected in the spring.

Gessler defended his new rule by arguing that he was seeking to make state election processes uniform and to guard against fraud. He never provided any evidence of fraud related to inactive voter ballots. Many believed Gessler, a longtime Republican partisan campaign finance and election law attorney, was engaging in thinly veiled vote suppression.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.

The Colorado Independent

Nader still addressing 2004 ballot access injustice: Update on lawsuit in Maine

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

from Ballot Access News
Briefing Schedule Set in Nader Lawsuit Against Democratic National Committee for 2004 Behavior

February 16th, 2011

The Maine Supreme Court has set a briefing schedule in Nader v Maine Democratic Party, et al, case no. washington-county-10-678. This is the tort lawsuit filed in 2009 in which Nader argues that the Democratic National Committee and its allies, in 2004, filed meritless challenges to his ballot access petitions, and engaged in dirty tricks against his circulators. Nader’s brief is due on April 8; the response is due May 27; and the rebuttal is due June 10. The central issue now is whether the lower court should have conducted a trial.

Background in a previous story from Ballot Access News: here

Independent Political Report

Colorado’s new Public Health and Environment director still hedging on climate change science

Sunday, February 6th, 2011

In the end, after some false starts and rhetorical meandering, the question was simple: Do you believe that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and contributes to climate change and therefore poses a serious health threat to humans? Al Gore and an overwhelming majority of climate scientists the world over answer a straightforward yes to that question. Most of the Republicans in Congress, however, answer no. Oil and gas climate “researchers” also answer no. Dr. Chris Urbina, the new Director of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment didn’t seem sure how to answer the question, or at least didn’t know how to answer state Republican senators asking him the question at his confirmation hearing Thursday.

Urbina

“Lots of things contribute to air pollution,” Urbina told Republican Sen. Shawn Mitchell. “Things that we produce naturally are contributing to air and water pollution. Human waste. Lots of things … all of those things contribute to that pollution … natural products [like carbon dioxide] do contribute to pollution … whether one of those products contribute more than any others, I would be happy to come back to talk about this very issue….”

Mitchell wasn’t satisfied.

“Will it be your direction in the office that carbon dioxide is a harmful agent that needs to be restricted in output?”

Urbina wasn’t confident to speak on the matter at the moment.

“I need to look more at the detail of the science. I would like to get back to you on this question.”

The carbon dioxide interrogation started with questioning from Republican Sen. Kent Lambert and ended with questions from Mitchell.

Can’t see the audio player? Click here.

Can’t see the audio player? Click here.

Urbina is not a climate scientist. He is a trained medical doctor and has earned impressive degrees and has even more impressive experience in the field of public health.

Mark Salley, spokesman at the Department of Public Health and Environment, told The Colorado Independent that in the short time he has been working with the new director, the two have not had the time to discuss climate change science. Four hours later, neither Salley nor Urbina has called to answer Mitchell’s yes or no question, this time asked by The Colorado Independent.

Americans are used to seeing politicians back each other down on this issue. They’re not used to seeing professionals back down on this issue or cast about for answers when their work lives are based not on public posturing and rhetorical flourishes but on science.

From the governor’s website announcing Urbina’s appointment to the Department:

Urbina earlier worked in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of New Mexico, holding positions of Associate Chair and Associate Professor. He also worked for the New Mexico Health and Environment Department as a district health officer.

Urbina continues to teach in introductory public health courses at the Colorado School of Public Health and at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. He is the current president of the Colorado Public Health Association and serves as a board member for the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in Denver Metro, the Denver Foundation and at Clinica Tepeyac, in addition to being involved in numerous other local health organizations.

He earned a bachelor’s degree in biology from Stanford University and a medical degree from the University of Colorado School of Medicine. He completed a family practice residency at the University of New Mexico and earned a master’s degree in public health from Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health. Urbina is board certified in Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine.

Hat tip to Colorado Pols for the audio.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.

Colorado Independent

State of da mayor: Still ‘numbas one’

Sunday, January 16th, 2011

Welcome back, Mumbles.

The mayor for life returned this week to deliver his annual State of the City address….

Home – BostonHerald.com

Harry Kresky: Abraham Lincoln’s “government of the people, by the people, for the people” still needed defending

Saturday, November 20th, 2010

UPDATED 11.16.10 — This just in: Defendants for independent voters filed a post trial brief. Read here:

Post Trial Brief Kresky Allen Idaho Case 1-08-Cv-00165-BLW

The Idaho Partisan Problem

by Harry Kresky

As I flew back to New York from Boise last month, I thought about our history as independents and felt a deep appreciation of this moment. 147 years after the Gettysburg Address, Abraham Lincoln’s “government of the people, by the people, for the people” still needed defending.

Gettysburg, November 19, 1863 

In July 2008 I joined with Idaho attorney Gary Allen to represent 11 Idaho independent voters,  the Committee for a Unified Independent Party, Inc. (a/k/a independentvoting.org), and the American Independent Movement of Idaho seeking to intervene as defendants in a lawsuit brought by the Idaho Republican Party (“IRP”) to dismantle the State’s open primary system. Intervention was granted, and in October, 2010 the case went to trial. We are now awaiting a decision by U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill.

If the IRP wins the lawsuit, the 28 percent of the Idaho electorate who are independents, will be barred from participation in Idaho’s primary elections unless they registered into a political party which they do not wish to do. As the lawsuit progressed, it became apparent that more than the narrow issue of their participation in the first round of voting is at stake. At a time when Americans are deeply concerned with how partisanship is making it increasingly difficult to achieve consensus (or even constructive compromise) on the issues facing our country, plaintiffs  assert that the U.S. Constitution (which makes no mention of political parties) not only protects the right of citizens to organize  parties, but guarantees party organizations a dominant role in determining  the electoral framework.

The issue before the Court is the people v. the parties. As independents, we believe that  in a democracy the people determine the form of government and how those who govern are chosen. Apparently, not everyone agrees with this proposition. The expert witness retained by the IRP in support of its effort to close the primaries, a Professor at Duke University, had the following back and forth with me at his deposition:

Q.   Right.  Okay.  But isn’t this whole thing about the voter?  Isn’t that what democracy is?

A.   No, sir.

Q.   What is democracy?

A.   Democracy is about having a strong,  responsible, party system that offers a clearly articulated set of alternatives that educates voters and gives them the information they need to make informed choices.  Voters on their own can’t make choices.

I can only hope that Gary and I made the people’s case.

Harry Kresky is an attorney based in NYC who represents CUIP (independentvoting.org). He blogs at Legal Briefs.

The Hankster

SD16, HD61 still up in the air as vote counting continues

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

The balance of power isn’t likely to change, but a few Colorado state legislative races are still up in the air nearly a week after last Tuesday’s midterm elections.

Jeanne Nicholson

In Senate District 16, where Democratic stalwart Dan Gibbs created a vacuum when he stepped down to run unopposed for Summit County commissioner, current Democratic Gilpin County Commissioner Jeanne Nicholson is clinging to about a 500-vote lead over Republican and Tea Party favorite Tim Leonard, a Colorado founder of the American Constitution Party.

Nicholson, a former county health nurse, says she doesn’t expect the SD16 race to be resolved for more than a week.

“What we know so far is that I am ahead with 537 more votes than my opponent, according to the clerk and recorder websites for all six of the counties [in the mountainous Front Range district]. What we don’t know is the full count for the provisional ballots and the mail-in ballots, military ballots, etc,” Nicholson said over the weekend.

The Boulder Daily Camera reported those numbers actually tightened over the weekend, but not enough to trigger an automatic recount. The paper reported a batch of uncounted Jefferson County ballots shrank Nicholson’s lead to just 452 votes, or 30,101 for Nicholson and 29,649 for Leonard.

“So we feel like we will not want to claim victory until we have that final result in out of respect for all of the people who voted in the election in Senate District 16, either for myself or my opponent and that we won’t know those final results and have an official announcement from the clerk and recorders’ offices and the Secretary of State until Nov. 19,” Nicholson told the Colorado Independent. “Of course, I’ll be delighted to represent all the citizens in the district if that is the wish of the voters.”

The results will not change the Democratic majority in the state Senate, where if Nicholson wins it will be a 20-15 edge. If Leonard somehow pulls it out, that margin will be a slightly tighter 19-16 majority.

In one key state House race, HD61, things are little more complicated, with write-in independent incumbent Kathleen Curry winning a court ruling Friday mandating that Colorado of Secretary of State Bernie Buescher must count ballots where voters wrote in Curry’s name but did not fill out a box or oval next to her name. Buescher had ruled those ballots would not count, and Curry sued. Now Buescher has until Wednesday to appeal.

Again, the balance of power is not expected to shift. After Tuesday, Republicans held a slim 33-32 majority in the House. A win by Curry over Democrat Roger Wilson would make that a 33-31-1 split in favor of the Republicans.

According to the website Real Aspen, Wilson was leading on Saturday with 9,496 votes to 9,001 for Curry, a difference of 495 votes. Real Aspen reported 29,390 ballots had been cast and only 27,389 had been counted.

“It is possible Curry may have received the greatest number of votes in the HD 61 race. Refusing to count these votes would thwart the clear intention of the electorate, as well as the intent of the election code,” Judge John W. Madden wrote in his decision on Friday.

“We hope the county clerks are allowed to do their job soon, and begin the count,” Curry told Real Aspen on Saturday. “The state could still delay this decision if they choose to fight against voter intent and appeal this ruling.”

Buescher originally ruled Curry, a three-term Democrat, switched to independent too late to have her name appear on the ballot, forcing her to run as a write-in. No write-in has ever won a state House seat, according to several sources, leaving Curry with a daunting uphill task. Her showing in Tuesday’s election has been surprising strong even give her name recognition.

Harvie Branscomb, Democratic chairman for House District 61, told the Denver Post on Sunday that all the ballots in the race should be recounted by hand, not just the 2,000 or so under votes for Curry that were thrown out because of Buescher’s ruling.

“I’m quite … opposed to partially recounting the contest,” Branscomb told the Post. “I really don’t think it’s fair for the court to say that the vote count can only go up for Kathleen Curry but it can’t go up for any other candidate.”

Colorado Democratic Party chairwoman Pat Waak told the paper she hasn’t yet decided whether to lobby Buescher to appeal the judge’s ruling.

Got a tip? Freelance story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.

Colorado Independent

Republicans reclaim state House, but votes are still being counted

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

The red wave that swept America in last week’s election didn’t exactly miss Colorado, but it was very selective.

It will probably be felt most acutely in the State Legislature, where control will be split, the Republicans gaining a one- or two-seat edge in the House. Democrats will retain control of the Colorado Senate, probably by a 20-15 margin.

Speaker Terrance Carroll on the first day of the 2009 session. (Photo/Bob Spencer, The Colorado Independent)

While Colorado Democratic Party officials still say they are waiting for all the votes to be counted in a couple of races, it appears to most that House Democrats took a big hit, going from a 37-27-1 majority to being down one seat, 33-32, or possibly 33-31-1 if unaffiliated candidate Kathleen Curry prevails in HD 61.

Among Democratic losers in the House were:

Debbie Benefield, Arvada, who is losing HD 29 to Robert Ramirez by just over 200 votes.

Joe Rice, Littleton, who lost HD 38 to Kathleen Conti by a 52-48 margin.

Dennis Apuan, Colorado Springs, who lost HD 17 to Mark Barker by a 54-46 margin.

Dianne Primavera, Broomfield, who is losing HD 33 to Donald Beezley by around 400 votes.

But the Colorado Democratic Party still had this language on its website as of this morning:

The Colorado State House is one representative shy of the majority. We continue to review the votes for several House races. We will miss the wise counsel of Joe Rice, Sarah Gagliardi and Dennis Apuan. And we hope to discover the votes needed to bring back Debbie Benefield and Diane Primavera.

And Benefield had this to say Monday afternoon: “Of course I still have a chance.”

She said she is currently behind by 208 votes, but that there are hundreds of provisional and military ballots still to be counted.

A source in the Democratic Party who did not want to be identified but whose job entails keeping a close eye on the late ballot counting process, said there are still about 4,000 provisional ballots in Jefferson County that have not been counted. Only a portion of those are in HD 29, but he said it is way too soon to declare a winner in that race.

“We may not know who won that race until the middle of the month,” he said. He also said there are still a lot of votes to be counted in HD 33, but with the Republicans having a larger lead there among votes already counted, that race seems less likely to flip. Provisional ballots tend to tilt Democratic, he said.

While the Democratic Party may still be saying, “let’s wait and see,” both parties in both chambers have been busy electing leaders for the 2011 session.

Last session’s Speaker of the House Democrat Terrance Carroll has reportedly offered his congratulations to Republican Rep. Frank McNulty, Highlands Ranch, for capturing majority control of the Colorado House, where he has already been named Speaker for next year.

The Democrats managed to hold off challenges to all but one of their state Senate seats in last week’s election, leaving them firmly in control with a 20-15 majority. While some still hold out for a Republican victory in SD 16, Jeanne Nicholson was leading Tim Leonard by more than 500 this morning.

How much a split legislature matters is unclear.

“The biggest difference (in the House) is that their party now picks the chairs of all the committees,” said Rep. Jim Riesberg, D-Greeley.

He also noted that as most committees have 11 members, in the next session, that will mean committees each have six Republicans and five Democrats.

“As long as people vote on the issues, I really don’t think it will make much difference. Last year, more than 80 percent of the bills that passed the House had at least 50 votes (out of 65).”

Similarly, on redistricting, he said that anytime the legislature tries to gerrymander the districts, the courts have stepped in to redraw the lines anyway.

“We will make every effort to work together with the Republicans,” he said.

Democratic Rep. Max Tyler, HD 23, Lakewood, says there was no red wave in Colorado. “The House is Republican because of less than 300 votes in one district. That’s hardly a wave,” he said.

Tyler, elected to his first full term after having been appointed to fill a vacancy, said it felt great to win. Unusual in a state legislative race, Tyler’s opponent, Edgar Johannson, moved to the district from Denver just to run against Tyler. Also unusual was that Tyler was targeted by a well-funded TV effort, with negative ads running during prime time sporting events.

“I think I won because of my deep roots in the community.” He said he thinks Republican leadership will make it difficult to pass legislation favoring green energy. “When the other side thinks climate change is a hoax, it will be hard to get clean energy legislation through,” he said.

“With a majority in the House, we are going to have the chance to move Colorado forward with bipartisan cooperation,” said newly elected Speaker of the House Frank McNulty.

“We will be on equal footing with Democrats in the next session,” McNulty said. “We will focus on finding common ground with Democrats in the House and in the Senate and with Governor Elect [John] Hickenlooper. We know that Hickenlooper has good ideas he would like to pursue in putting Colorado back to work and we look forward to meaningful and substantive conversations with the governor and the Democratic Senate,” McNulty added.

Colorado Independent

You can still register to vote in person on election day in the following states:

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

You can still register to vote in person on election day in the following states: * Idaho Any person who is eligible to vote may register on election day by appearing in person at the polling place for the precinct … Continue reading
republican-elephant.com

Still Time to Register to Vote

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

The deadline to register to vote in this year’s election is October 12th.

As I’m sure you know, we are just 25 days away from another important Election Day.    Just two years ago, Virginians from across the Commonwealth came together and helped elect President Obama, Senator Warner, and our outstanding Democratic congressmen.    Virginia Democrats have come a long way, but this year the Republicans are certain that they are poised to win big in November and erase the progress we’ve worked so hard for.

If you support President Obama and don’t want the Republicans to take us backward, make sure you get to the polls this November and vote for the Democrats who have been working hard for us since we elected them in 2008.     The deadline to register to vote in this year’s election is October 12th.    If you aren’t sure if you’re registered you can check your status by clicking here.

If you have recently changed your address or moved since you last registered to vote, you have until October 12th to  re-register in order to make your voice heard in this year’s elections.

Finally, if you are not available to vote on Election Day, you can still vote early by mail by applying for an ABSENTEE BALLOT or vote in person at your local voter registrar’s office.
                                                                 
  
                                                              VOTE 

After all we’ve accomplished, we’ve still got a lot of work to do. Vote on November 2nd to stand with President Obama and the hard-working Democrats who are out there fighting to create jobs and make life better for every Virginia family.

                                 VOTE

Tom Perriello

Tom Perriello Remarks at Barack Obama Rally, Lynchburg, VA , EC Glass High School Gym.     The Liberty republicans refused to let people park at the Plaza and the City hurridly arranged bus transport from City Stadium to the High School for people wishing to see Obama.     The crowd was overflow.     2,000 plus in the gym and 3,000 plus outside.     Loudspeakers were set up outside so the crowd could hear Obam and Perriello speak.      Of course it all turned out well, Obama became President and Perriello won and went to Congress and Jerry Jr. did his religous bit for the republican party by making it more difficult for the democrats to attend the rally.     Click to see.
 
 
Lastly, Amherst County Democrats
 
We’ve got some exciting news here at IAVA HQ.



We’ve teamed up with JCPenney and Joseph Abboud to launch “Welcome Home Joe,” a program that starts today and will give away million in professional attire to Iraq and Afghanistan vets transitioning from combat to career – all for free.


Do you know a veteran of Iraq or Afghanistan? Please take a minute to forward this email so they have a chance to receive a 0 certificate for professional attire through The Rucksack.


This is another groundbreaking way that IAVA is working with our partners to help new veterans get jobs by giving them the tools they need.


Don’t forget that Veterans Day is just around the corner – IAVA will be taking part in local events across the country.     Whether it’s marching in a parade, volunteering on the ground, or helping spread the word, there are many ways to get involved. Sign Up Here and we’ll let you know how you can get involved this year.


Thank you for having our backs.


Paul


Paul Rieckhoff
Executive Director and Founder
Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA)

Amherst County Virginia Democratic News