Posts Tagged ‘Americans’

Ruy May Rue the Day He Dismissed Independent Voters – And Their Bond With African Americans

Wednesday, March 21st, 2012

INDEPENDENTVOTING.ORG NETWORKS

  • Ruy the Day! A Review of Ruy Teixeira’s Review of The Swing Vote: The Untapped Power of Independents by Linda Killian (by Jacqueline Salit, Huffington Post) Wow! For a man (actually, make that a MAN) who has devoted his political career to resuscitating a Democratic Party governing majority (he co-wrote The Emerging Democratic Majority in 2002), you would think he’d be a little more cautious about denouncing independents. Otherwise, his hoped for majority may get another slam, as it did in 2010 when independents expressed their disappointment and frustration with President Obama’s inability to conquer the partisanship in Washington, including the partisanship of his own party. Ruy might rue the day he tried to tear down Killian and the volatile movement-in-the-making she writes about.
  • LINDA KILLIAN OUTBREAK: The Uses of Polarization (By THOMAS B. EDSALL, NY Times/ The Opinion Pages/ Campaign Stops) At the same time, the percentage of the electorate that can accurately be described as independent — without partisan allegiance — has shrunk to about 7 percent, according to Ruy Teixeira of the Brookings Institution. While the importance of such voters has diminished, in a closely balanced contest these relatively uninvolved men and women have the power to determine the outcome: in the 12 presidential elections from 1964 to 2008, four – 1968, 1976, 2000 and 2004 – have been decided by 2.5 percentage points or less.
  • Historic Bond Ties African-Americans and Independents Together (LETTER The Hankster, by Bob Friedman, PHOTOS online) Last week I joined Rev. Al Sharpton and the National Action Network on the march from Selma to Montgomery. I am one of the 40% of Americans who are independent of both of the major parties. Back in the days of Ross Perot, the media called guys like me “angry white men.” Along the route, I spoke with many people and brought greetings from Dr. Lenora Fulani, the country’s leading African American independent with whom I’ve worked closely and from IndependentVoting.org, the country’s largest organization of independent voters of which I’m a part.
  • YOUR VIEW: Independent voters disfranchised in many states because of parties (Bob Friedman, Letters from our readers By Letters from our readers, Alabama.com) I want to respond to and applaud the Your Views letter “Alabama’s closed primary infringes on voters’ rights” in the March 10 Birmingham News by sharing the following. I couldn’t agree more that since we pay for the primaries, they should be nonpartisan, more like “top two” as they have in California.
  • The black vote: 5 states where Obama needs a big African-American turnout (By Perry Bacon Jr.,The Grio) President Obama’s campaign will likely need the kind of strong black turnout he received in 2008 to win re-election, particularly if some of the white independent voters who backed him four years ago opt for the Republican candidate because of frustration over the president’s tenure.

The Hankster

Edward Luce vs. Daniel Larison on the Prospects for Americans Elect

Wednesday, February 29th, 2012

Here paleoish conservative blogger Daniel Larison discusses Edward Luce’s Financial Times article on Americans Elect. (Registration is required to get to the actual FT article.) Suffice it to say that Luce is hopeful and Larison is not.

The volatility inside the GOP primary electorate does not mean that there would be automatic support in polls for a “centrist” third-party challenger. When “very conservative” voters launch a half dozen candidates into fleeting contention with Romney because they cannot abide the former governor, it does not follow that there is an opportunity for a “centrist” candidate to poll in double digits.

Read more…

Blogger PostDiggDeliciousEmailFacebookFarkFriendFeedGoogle BookmarksGoogle GmailLinkedInRedditStumbleUponSlashdotShare

Independent Political Report

Forrester Blasts House Republicans’ Vote to Raise Taxes on 160 Million Americans

Sunday, December 25th, 2011

Following Tuesday’s vote by House Republicans to reject an extension of the payroll tax cut for the middle class passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in the Senate, Tennessee Democratic Party Chairman Chip Forrester issued the following statement:

“In less than two weeks, 160 million Americans will be hit with a tax hike in the middle of the holiday season because House Republicans turned their backs on America’s working families and voted against extending a payroll tax cut for the middle class.

“Their inaction comes just days after Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. Senate, including Sen. Lamar Alexander, worked together in the name of compromise to pass a two-month extension of the payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance benefits that provide a vital lifeline to millions of Americans who have lost their jobs as a result of the economic downturn.

“That bipartisan bill passed the Senate 89-10 – with the support of many conservative Republicans – and after this critical compromise, for House Republicans to say no and vote to raise taxes on 160 million hardworking Americans is simply extremism at its worst.

“It’s more and more clear that Tennessee’s Republican Congressmen are terrified of disappointing Tea Party extremists, even if the consequence is a tax increase on millions of working and middle-class families.

“This is a Republican-inflicted wound to our economic recovery.

“Republicans pay lip service to the middle class. But, when push comes to shove they will move heaven and earth to pass tax breaks for millionaires, billionaires and big corporations while raising taxes on 160 million middle class Americans.

“That’s a position for which they will pay a price with the American people.”

###

TN Democratic Party News

hey congress, 40 % of americans are independent

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

The Hankster

End of October 2011 Update on Americans Elect

Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

The October 2011 Ballot Access News reports the following data for Americans Elect ballot drives from about a month ago:

Alabama, 20,000 signatures (44,829 valid needed)
Alaska, already on
Arizona, already on
Arkansas, 0 (Paulie: they went for the 1,000 signature requirement and I believe they have collected them now)
California, finished (P: Over 1.6 million signatures submitted)
Colorado, 7,500
Florida, already on
Georgia, 6,000 collected; 57,956 valid required
Hawaii, finished
Kansas, already on
Maine, 500 towards 28,639 requirement
Michigan, already on
Missouri, finished
Montana, showed as O signatures but subsequent story says it started (5,000 valid required)
Nevada, already on
North Carolina, showed as O signatures but subsequent story says it started (85,379 valid required)
Ohio, subsequent story says signatures are being collected although number needed is not known
Oklahoma, showed as O signatures but subsequent story says it started (51,739 valid required)
Oregon, showed as O signatures but subsequent story says it started (21,804 valid required)
Rhode Island, showed as O signatures but subsequent story says it started (17,115 valid required)
South Carolina, showed as O signatures but subsequent story says it started (10,000 valid required)
Tennessee, showed as O signatures but subsequent story says it started (40,042 valid required)
Utah, finished
Wyoming, showed as O signatures but subsequent story says it started (3,740 valid required)

Meanwhile, at Irregular Times:

Americans Elect Hiring Actors with Accents to Appear in an Advertisement for

New Briefing Book Shows New Means for Americans Elect Meddling with Candidate Selection

Americans Elect Names 10 New Leaders, Drawing Heavily Again from Financial Sector

Guest Post: Americans Elect: The ‘Little Big Man’ of Astroturf? by Dr. Dawg (see comment thread)

Previous updates

Blogger PostDiggDeliciousEmailFacebookFarkFriendFeedGoogle BuzzGoogle BookmarksGoogle GmailLinkedInRedditShoutwireStumbleUponSlashdotShare

Independent Political Report

Americans Elect coverage at Ballot Access News, Irregular Times and ThirdPartyPolitics.us

Friday, September 30th, 2011

Since my last update:

Latest updates on Americans Elect

At Ballot Access News:

Portland, Oregon TV Station News Clip About Americans Elect

Editorial Page Editor of Tallahassee Democrat Newspaper on Americans Elect

Stanley Greenberg on Independent Voters and on Chances of a Strong Third Force in 2012 Presidential Race

Dan Morain Article on Americans Elect Carries More Detail than Most Such Articles

Fox News Airs Five-Minute Interview with Elliot Ackerman, Spokesman for Americans Elect

At Irregular Times:

Chairs of Americans Elect Rules Committee: A Coal/Casino GOP Lobbyist and a Lieberman Democrat

Americans Elect Spins Clear Trends on Economy and the Budget into Third Way Centrism

Americans Elect Corporation names itself a Grassroots Movement, embraces “Moderate” Ideological Label

Americans Elect Picks Core Questions for 2012 without Member Input

Asked Point Blank, Americans Elect Refuses to Disclose $$$ from Billionaire Peter Ackerman

Ron Paul fans and GOPsters Flood Americans Elect Facebook Page

Our Oregon Sums Up Current Knowledge on Americans Elect

Democracy21 asks IRS to Investigate Americans Elect for Corporate Code Violations

At ThirdPartyPolitics.US:

Latest Americans Elect News

Americans Elect: Are the Presidential Debates Answering Your Questions?

Americans Elect: Press Release: While Republicans Offer More of the Same, Americans Elect Delegates Are Shaping the Debate for the Nation

Americans Elect: Strengthen Your Voice by Spreading the Word About Americans Elect

Americans Elect: AE Delegates See Third Way on Budget Deficit

Press Release: Americans Elect Launches Nationwide Grassroots Network Project 500

Blogger PostDiggDeliciousEmailFacebookFarkFriendFeedGoogle BuzzGoogle BookmarksGoogle GmailLinkedInRedditShoutwireStumbleUponSlashdotShare

Independent Political Report

Congress Reaches A New Low With Americans

Friday, September 23rd, 2011

If you don’t really care for how our government is handling things then you’re not alone.  I was just reading this article and it caught my eye.  Apparently most of us are not very \”happy\” with our government is handling much of anything.  The next elections should be really interesting and full of more \”promises\”. [...]
Best News & Politics

hey, congress! 40 percent of americans are independents!

Monday, August 15th, 2011

independentvoting.org

The Hankster

Can Americans cut Carbs from their Diet

Friday, July 8th, 2011

Many people are still seriously confused about what types of food to eat to lose weight, and it’s not really their fault. The conventional nutritional dogma of the last decade has been pushing a low-fat or fat-free diet on Americans, misleading them into thinking they’ve got to cut out fat to lose weight.

As Americans cut fats from their diet (and also the protein that’s often abundant in full-fat foods), they replaced them with carbohydrates — and not the good kind in vegetables. Partly as a result of Americans’ reliance on unhealthy carbs — bagels, pasta, pretzels, rice, potatoes, etc. — a full two-thirds of the U.S. population is overweight or obese, and nearly one in four is considered obese, not just overweight.

The idea that cutting carbs from your diet can lead to weight loss is beginning to catch on though, and as the new study above points out, even moderate reductions in your carb consumption can help you shed extra pounds.

Cutting Carbs, Not Fat, Helps Reduce Body Fat

Researchers from the University of Alabama at Birmingham revealed that when 69 overweight people were given a diet with a modest reduction in carbohydrates for eight weeks, they had 11 percent less deep abdominal fat than those given a lower-fat diet. Further, during a second eight-week period in which calories were reduced by 1,000 each day, those on the lower-carb diet lost 4 percent more total body fat.

An important point is that the reduced-carb diet promoted the loss of deep belly fat, also known as “visceral fat,” even when no change in weight was apparent.



Visceral fat is strongly linked with type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and other chronic diseases. It is thought that visceral fat is related to the release of proteins and hormones that can cause inflammation, which in turn can damage arteries and enter your liver, affecting how your body breaks down sugars and fats.

While it’s often referred to as “belly fat” because it can cause a “beer belly” or an apple-shaped body, you can have visceral fat even if you’re thin. So even if you aren’t trying to lose weight, cutting unhealthy carbs in your diet could have a positive impact on your levels of visceral fat, and thereby potentially reduce your risk of chronic disease.

Fructose: The Biggest Carb Culprit

People on low-carb diets lose weight in part because they get less fructose, a type of sugar that can be made into body fat quickly. Although fructose is naturally found in high levels in fruit, it is also added to many processed foods, especially in the form of high-fructose corn syrup. If your only source of fructose came from eating an apple or orange a day, keeping your total grams of fructose to below 25 per day, then it would not be an issue.



But what many completely fail to appreciate is that fructose is the NUMBER ONE source of calories in the United States and the typical person is consuming 75 grams of fructose each and every day. Because fructose is so cheap it is used in virtually all processed foods. The average person is consuming one-third of a pound of sugar every day, which is five ounces or 150 grams, half of which is fructose. This is 300 percent more than the amount that will trigger biochemical havoc, and this is the average — many consume more than twice that amount.

Evidence is mounting that excess sugar, and fructose in particular, is the primary factor in the obesity epidemic, so it’s definitely a food you want to avoid if you want to lose weight. Does this mean you need to avoid fruit too? As you can see in this table, some fruits are very high in fructose, so munching indiscriminately on the wrong ones could set you back.

Fruit Serving Size Grams of Fructose
Limes 1 medium 0
Lemons 1 medium 0.6
Cranberries 1 cup 0.7
Passion fruit 1 medium 0.9
Prune 1 medium 1.2
Apricot 1 medium 1.3
Guava 2 medium 2.2
Date (Deglet Noor style) 1 medium 2.6
Cantaloupe 1/8 of med. melon 2.8
Raspberries 1 cup 3.0
Clementine 1 medium 3.4
Kiwifruit 1 medium 3.4
Blackberries 1 cup 3.5
Star fruit 1 medium 3.6
Cherries, sweet 10 3.8
Strawberries 1 cup 3.8
Cherries, sour 1 cup 4.0
Pineapple 1 slice
(3.5″ x .75″)
4.0
Grapefruit, pink or red 1/2 medium 4.3
Fruit Serving Size Grams of Fructose
Boysenberries 1 cup 4.6
Tangerine/mandarin orange 1 medium 4.8
Nectarine 1 medium 5.4
Peach 1 medium 5.9
Orange (navel) 1 medium 6.1
Papaya 1/2 medium 6.3
Honeydew 1/8 of med. melon 6.7
Banana 1 medium 7.1
Blueberries 1 cup 7.4
Date (Medjool) 1 medium 7.7
Apple (composite) 1 medium 9.5
Persimmon 1 medium 10.6
Watermelon 1/16 med. melon 11.3
Pear 1 medium 11.8
Raisins 1/4 cup 12.3
Grapes, seedless (green or red) 1 cup 12.4
Mango 1/2 medium 16.2
Apricots, dried 1 cup 16.4
Figs, dried 1 cup 23.0



If you struggle with insulin resistance, which you would know by measuring your fasting insulin level and seeing if it is over 5 OR if you have any of the following conditions, you’ll need to be particularly careful about limiting your fructose intake to 15 grams per day or less.

  • Overweight
  • Diabetes
  • High blood pressure
  • High cholesterol

These “Healthful” Carbs Should be Avoided Too

Many dieters snack on pretzels in lieu of potato chips and other salty snacks, believing them to be healthier alternatives. But eating pretzels is akin to dipping a spoon straight into a bowl of sugar, as that’s precisely the way your body responds to this refined carbohydrate snack.

Don’t be fooled by the fact that they’re “fat-free” – remember it’s the carbs that are the culprit.

Your body prefers the carbohydrates in vegetables rather than grains because it slows the conversion to simple sugars like glucose, and decreases your insulin level. Grain carbohydrates, like those in pretzels, will increase your insulin resistance and interfere with your ability to burn fat — which is the last thing you want if you’re trying to lose weight.

Even cereals, whether high-fiber, whole-grain or not, are not a food you want to eat if you’re concerned about your weight. If they contain sugar, that will tend to increase your insulin levels even more … but even “healthy” sugarless cereals are an oxymoron, since grains rapidly break down to sugar in your body, stimulating insulin production and encouraging weight gain.

Of course, increasing numbers of people are now aware that refined carbs like white sugar and white bread may make you pack on the pounds. But many are still being misled that “good” carbs like whole grains and fruit won’t. Remember, whether it’s a whole grain, a sprouted grain or a refined grain, ALL grains rapidly break down to sugar, which causes your insulin resistance to increase and will make your weight problems worse.

This is NOT the case with vegetables, however. Vegetables will NOT convert into sugar the way grains do, and most Americans need to eat far more vegetables. Eating carbs in the form of vegetables may make your carb intake higher, but will not be a hindrance to your health goals. One caveat, corn and potatoes do not count as vegetables; they act much more like grains as far as your body is concerned.

So What Should You Eat to Lose Weight?

Many people resist the idea of cutting grain and sugar from their diets, wondering what else there is to eat if they avoid bread, potatoes, pizza, baked goods and other unhealthy carbs.

The truth is, there is a wonderful variety of delicious foods available that are not processed, full of fructose or based on refined white sugar and flour. I’ve outlined many of them in my comprehensive nutrition plan, and this is the place I recommend you start if you want to tweak your diet to lose weight or just become healthier.

This program will take you from the beginner stage through intermediate and advanced, allowing you to make healthy changes to your diet and lifestyle one step at a time, at a pace that feels comfortable to you.

My program comes from decades of experience in which I have researched extensively, conferred with my professional colleagues, and most importantly, successfully treated tens of thousands of patients. Many are struggling with weight issues, but I am certain that if you adhere to the recommendations in my program, you will reach your weight loss goals.

Again, the details are outlined in my nutrition plan, but generally speaking a “healthy diet” is qualified by the following key factors:

  • Unprocessed whole foods
  • Often raw or only lightly cooked
  • Organic or grass-fed, and free from additives and genetically modified ingredients
  • Come from high-quality, local sources
  • Carbohydrates primarily come from vegetables (except for corn or potatoes)

To round out your weight loss program, you’ll also need to have an effective exercise regimen, and for this intensity is key. High-intensity, burst-type exercises such as Peak 8 can significantly cut down on the amount of time you have to spend exercising, while optimizing your ability to burn body fat. Full instructions on how to properly perform these exercises can be found in this previous article.

 http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/08/cut-down-on-carbs-to-reduce-body-fat.aspx

The Democratic Republican: Politically Social

Jim Cook: Americans Elect Remains Closed Off from Citizens

Tuesday, March 29th, 2011

From an article posted by Jim Cook on March 25, 2011, on the blog ‘Irregular Times‘:

They Never Write, They Never Call

Over the past six months, I’ve made repeated efforts to reach out to the nascent 501c4 corporation/political party Americans Elect, establish contact and learn to see things from their point of view. I’ve made phone calls. I’ve sent e-mails. I’ve sent certified letters in the mail. I’ve asked simple questions. I’ve done all these things all at nicely spaced intervals so as to not give them a harried feeling. I have yet to receive a response.

Americans Elect has been engaging in outreach and sharing information, mind you, but only to limited audiences of powerful and well-connected people. Last fall, Peter Ackerman distributed literature regarding Americans Elect and solicited communication from attendees at a gala dinner charging up to ,000 a plate. Americans Elect also held an exclusive, invitation-only event in Aspen last summer at which it distributed literature to those in attendance. With the well-connected and well-heeled, Americans Elect has maintained lines of communication. It’s with the little people like you and me that Americans Elect isn’t communicating.

Read the rest here.

Blogger Post Digg Delicious Email Facebook Fark FriendFeed Google Buzz Google Bookmarks Google Gmail LinkedIn Reddit Shoutwire StumbleUpon Slashdot Share

Independent Political Report