MLK Fought for Civil Rights and Against Democrats
Wednesday, March 14th, 2012![]() |
|
|
| © National Black Republican Association, 2010. All Rights Reserved. | |
|
BLACK REPUBLICAN: National Black Republican Association E-News
![]() |
|
|
| © National Black Republican Association, 2010. All Rights Reserved. | |
|
BLACK REPUBLICAN: National Black Republican Association E-News
![]() |
|
|
| © National Black Republican Association, 2010. All Rights Reserved. | |
|
|
BLACK REPUBLICAN: National Black Republican Association E-News
![]() |
||
|
||
|
|
|
|
BLACK REPUBLICAN: National Black Republican Association E-News
Bob Barr was the Presidential candidate of the Libertarian Party in 2008, as well as a former member of the House of Representatives as a Republican. Barr now writes a regular column in The Daily Caller–in this article he urges readers to actively oppose SOPA.
Congress has been in a constitutionally feisty mood lately. Shortly before taking off for its traditional Christmas recess, for example, it passed the annual defense authorization bill, which included a troubling provision that apparently permits the U.S. military to indefinitely detain anyone — including American citizens — it suspects of having even remote ties to any group it has determined to be linked to terrorism.
Now, in what would be another serious blow to our liberties, which are supposed to be protected against government intrusion, some members of Congress are pushing legislation that would greatly impede our freedom to communicate over the Internet. The inaptly named “Stop Online Privacy Act” (SOPA) would supposedly protect intellectual property rights, but in effect would dramatically enhance the power of the federal government to block websites it suspects infringe intellectual property rights or simply promote the distribution of copyrighted content.
While Bob Barr’s byline biography notes his time in the House of Representatives, it does not mention his presidential candidacy with the Libertarian Party.
Denver District Judge Brian Whitney today ruled against Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler, saying Denver County may send ballots to inactive voters. Gessler had asked for a preliminary injunction to stop the mailing.
The ruling affects more than 50,000 voters in Denver. Voters are deemed inactive if they did not vote in the 2010 election or any elections since then.
Gessler had sued Denver to prevent Denver from mailing ballots to inactive voters. Pueblo County later joined the suit as a defendant, as did numerous progressive and voter rights organizations.
Pueblo County clerk Gilbert Ortiz announced today that he, too, would send ballots to soldiers serving overseas and to other inactive voters.
Maps show that in Denver inactive voters tend to be most prevalent in areas with heavy Hispanic concentrations. In recent years, inactive voters in Colorado have tended to be Democrats more than Republicans, perhaps indicative of people who turned out to vote for Obama in 2008, but then did not vote in the 2010 election.
Gessler has garnered statewide and national press as a result of the lawsuit, and the issue is not resolved by today’s ruling, as the full suit will be heard later.
In a press release sent to Green Party Watch, the Green Party of the United States endorsed plans to engage in a long term protest in Washington DC. Echoing the call from October2011.org, the press release quotes Sanda Everette of California.
“In making this endorsement, we’re challenging the dangerous political direction of the US. [...]
Green Party Watch
As Speaker of the House John Boehner prepares for a weekend fundraiser for Rep. Scott Tipton in Aspen, Tipton’s Democratic challenger, Sal Pace, went on the offensive Tuesday, saying he’s had it with a Republican Congress that publicly rails against any and all taxes while quietly working to end a small tax break enjoyed by workers for the past year.
“I can’t understand their logic and rationale at all. How can they say they support working families and not support extending this tax cut?” Pace said about Congressional Republicans in a phone interview.
That tax break, which went into effect this past January, reduced the payroll tax from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent for one year. The tax is scheduled to go back to 6.2 percent in January 2012. The payroll tax is designed to fund Social Security and is separate from income taxes. While the working poor often pay no income taxes, nearly everyone who gets a paycheck pays the payroll tax. President Obama has said he would like to extend the cut.
Republicans in Congress have said not so fast.
News flash: Congressional Republicans want to raise your taxes.
Impossible, right? GOP lawmakers are so virulently anti-tax, surely they will fight to prevent a payroll tax increase on virtually every wage-earner starting Jan. 1, right?
Apparently not.
Many of the same Republicans who fought hammer-and-tong to keep the George W. Bush-era income tax cuts from expiring on schedule are now saying a different “temporary” tax cut should end as planned. By their own definition, that amounts to a tax increase.
The tax break extension they oppose is sought by President Barack Obama. Unlike proposed changes in the income tax, this policy helps the 46 percent of all Americans who owe no federal income taxes but who pay a “payroll tax” on practically every dime they earn.
It’s not just Congress, GOP presidential candidates are busy clarifying that when they said they wouldn’t raise taxes, what they meant was that would only raise payroll taxes, because some working people just aren’t paying their fair share.
From Slate:
It’s not news when Jon Huntsman criticizes fellow Republicans. It’s news when he agrees with them. On Sunday, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Huntsman found himself in a virtual love-in with Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann over, of all things, taxes. The paper asked Huntsman if “the half of American households no longer paying income tax–mainly working poor families and seniors–should be brought onto the income tax rolls.”
He agreed, crediting the GOP’s current front-runner for vice president, Sen. Marco Rubio, with the insight that “we don’t have enough people paying taxes in this country.”
Pace said the tax cut helps 2.5 million Colorado families.
“It is shocking and appalling that with all the gridlock in Washington, House Republicans want to force a tax increase on working class families. They fight tooth and nail to cut taxes on billionaires and corporations when what we need to do is protect working people.”
Pace challenged Tipton to talk to Boehner about the need to extend the payroll tax cut for another year. “I challenge him to cross party lines for the first time in his career. I call on him to have courage and to show leadership on this issue. He has the opportunity this weekend to bend Speaker Boehner’s ear and convince him to change his position on this.”
Pace’s campaign against raising the payroll tax is part of a larger effort being launched by the Democratic Party to support the extension of the tax break.
At a campaign stop in Iowa on Friday, a member of the audience grilled Tim Pawlenty on his views about rights for LGBT people. Gabe Aderhold, a senior at Edina High School, asked Pawlenty why he has “not had the courage to stand for me and my friends. You are discriminating against me and it hurts.” Pawlenty said he will never be at the point “where I’ll say that every domestic relationship is the same as traditional marriage.”
Pawlenty has opposed all efforts in Minnesota to give same-sex couples the same rights as heterosexual couples. And his opposition extends beyond marriage equality. He vetoed legislation that would give same-sex couples the right to fulfill a deceased partner’s last wishes in 2010. In 2008, he vetoed a bill that would allow local units of government to provide health care benefits for same-sex couples.
Also in 2008, he vetoed a bill to allow government employees, including same-sex partners, to use sick time to care for a seriously ill family member. The Minnesota Family Council pressed for a veto and got one.
“The end game in all of this is a legal imposition of homosexual marriage upon the state of Minnesota,” said Tom Prichard, the group’s president, at the time.
Based on a national Green Party press release. As posted at onthewilderside.com
Green Party leaders urged President Obama to reverse his decision to withdraw from participation in the third World Conference against Racism (“Durban III”). US Green Party members will attend the conference.
The conference, sponsored by the United Nations, will take place in New York City on September 22, 2011, marking the tenth anniversary of the first World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance in 2001, which was held in Durban, South Africa. The Obama Administration has cited widespread anger against Israel and the US at past conferences, perceived to be antisemitic and anti-American, as the reason for the withdrawal.
“2011 is both the International Year of Afrodescendants and the 150th anniversary of the beginning of the US Civil War. As such, it is vitally important the United States of America have an official presence at Durban III, to join an open discussion with the rest of the world on racism and how to end it; racism here in the USA, as well as in other countries,” said Marian Douglas-Ungaro, co-chair of the Green Party’s International Committee (http://www.gp.org/committees/intl/) and a member of the Green Party Black Caucus (http://www.gp.org/caucuses/black/index.php).
“Any statement expressing religious or ethnic intolerance or incitement to hatred against the Jewish people deserves swift condemnation. But the U.S. and other western countries have often interpreted legitimate criticism of the state of Israel, which has maintained its brutal and illegal occupation of Palestinian lands and internal apartheid, as ‘antisemitic’. They’ve used this thinly-veiled excuse to withdraw from the Durban conferences to avoid situations where certain rights-violating policies would face scrutiny and criticism on the world stage,” said Muhammed Malik, Co-Chair of the Miami-Dade Green Party (http://miamidadegreenparty.org/) and former Racial Justice and Voting Rights Projects Associate at the ACLU Florida. Mr. Malik recently spoke about racial justice as a panelist on the opening plenary of the Rights Working Group’s Southeastern Regional Conference and is organizing a rally at the Israeli Consulate in Miami in support of
Palestinian rights and the Freedom Flotilla II to Gaza (http://ustogaza.org).
Greens said that the White House has avoided the Durban conferences also because of the failure of the US to address internal racial inequality, including continuing economic disparities and disadvantages suffered by people of color (such as the disproportionate loss of black families’ homes during the recent sub-prime mortgage crisis), the unaddressed call for reparations for the descendants of slavery, harassment and deportation of undocumented immigrants, the targeting of people of color in the War on Drugs, and record incarceration rates, with black, brown, poor, and young people locked up to feed the for-profit private prison industry.
Referring to Attorney General Eric Holder’s recent announcement that he will authorize the release of 5,500 federal prisoners to begin correcting sentencing disparities between crack and cocaine offenders, Green Party co-chair Theresa El-Amin said, “In this International Year of People of African Descent it’s beyond disappointing that the Obama Administration lifts a release of [only] 5,500 for nonviolent drug offenses when there are 2.4 million incarcerated in the United States. The fact that the majority of the 2.4 million are people of color makes the 5,500 release a non-event. The US is number one in the whole world in incarceration rates. China, which is four times more populous than the US, is a distant second with 1.6 million people in prison. The US pulling out of the Durban process is simply unacceptable.”
Ms. El-Amin, who plans to attend Durban III, was one of several human rights activists who participated in a special White House conference call briefing on Thursday, June 2. During the briefing, White House official Samantha Powers explained that the US delegation to the UN would withdraw from Durban III and cited “Israel” when asked why, drawing several statements of disappointment by other participants before the White House abruptly terminated the call.
Greens, including 2008 Green Party presidential nominee Cynthia McKinney, have participated in the first World Conference against Racism in 2001 and the second meeting (“Durban Review Conference”) in Geneva in 2009, both of which the US shunned. On August 8, 2001, the Green Party issued a strongly worded resolution on the withdrawal (http://www.gp.org/press/pr_08_13_01.html).
MORE INFORMATION
UN: One-day plenary event on the 10th anniversary of the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intorelance
http://www.un.org/events/calendar/Edetail.asp?EventID=1976&BeginDate=9/22/2011
2001 World Conference against Racism (UN site)
http://www.un.org/WCAR/
US Human Rights Network
http://www.ushrnetwork.org