Archive for the ‘Independent Party News’ Category

Retiring U.S. Sen. Snowe: End gridlock by rewarding compromise

Friday, March 23rd, 2012

The NewsHour on Wednesday tapped retiring moderate U.S. Senators Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) to discuss congressional dysfunction. Interviewed by Senior Correspondent Gwen Ifill, the two provided a free-wheeling inside view of what has happened over the last couple of decades on the Hill. They touched on the roll played by the media, no-tax pledges, no-compromise candidate platforms and sacred-cow entitlement programs. They also offered suggestions on what they would do, if they could, to address the gridlock that poll after poll suggests is detested by the vast majority of American citizens.

Watch Retiring Sens. Snowe, Bingaman: Political Center Is Fading on PBS. See more from PBS NewsHour.

A condensed version of the exchange:

Ifill: Are things irreconcilable?

Snowe: People have to step back and say, What’s the purpose of the United States Senate? What’s the objective of serving in public office. I happen to believe it’s problem solving. That I’ve come here to solve problems. That’s why I’ve been in public office for virtually 40 years. I believe we have an obligation, a responsibility to address the issues that come before your state or your country.

Does it seem to you like things are stuck?

Bingaman: Well… the whole country has become much more polarized politically. You have– the media is polarized. If you are of one point of view, you have one channel to watch. If you are of another point of view, you have a different channel to watch. I think that’s being reflected in the Congress. The Congress is more polarized. You have a lot of people running on a platform that they won’t compromise once they get to Washington They will stick to their guns. And of course our system of government was designed so that you gotta compromise.

Is it that people won’t compromise because they can’t or won’t compromise, or because, politically, they can’t afford to compromise?

Snowe: … People say to me, Why won’t you work together for the common good of the country? Now, the whole issue unfortunately with compromise is that people view it with disdain. It’s viewed as a capitulation of your principles. It’s not.

Sen. Snowe, I hereby grant you a magic wand. What’s the fix?

Snowe: A return to transparency and accountability would really build confidence in the integrity of the outcome of the legislation. We don’t have that anymore. It’s a closed door. It either comes to the floor without going through a committee. It’s crafted behind closed doors. We have up or down votes. I mean it’s sort of similar to the House. I feel like I’m back in the House. We have up or down votes. Have an open amendment process. Have people air their views.

And, sometimes, when you have that opportunity, you might not agree on everything in the package, which you might not because — if it’s a big package — but, at the end of the day, so, you know, I’ve made my voice heard on behalf of my constituents, and the ultimate result is something that I now can support, even if it’s not everything that I wanted.

Doesn’t the dysfunction have a chance to take greater hold with your absence?

Snowe: Well, you know, my concern is that it’s not going to change on the short term, and that’s what I had to consider at where I am in my own life…

I am concerned that the lines have drawn. I mean, the analyses that have been done recently about ratings of various — of all of us as senators, whether conservative or liberal and so on, back in 1982, there were 58 senators that came between the most conservative Democrat and the most liberal Republican. Today, there are none.

So there’s not much of a center, and we have to decide that the institution has to not only solve problems, but the American people have to give rewards to those people and individuals who are willing to work across party lines. There are no political rewards for that today.

The discussion echoed the question Daily Show host Jon Stewart in 2004 famously took to Crossfire, the CNN cable debate show that folded soon after Stewart appeared and told the hosts their predictable ginned-up left-right debates were doing a disservice to the country. “Just stop,” he said. Video of the exchange went viral and Americans applauded Stewart for articulating an exhaustion with the way cable news- and talk radio-style political theater seemed to be overtaking political reality.

In the short time he has been in office, Colorado U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet has made news for his evocative railing against the do-nothing anachronistic nature of the Senate and has taken to the floor on occasion to desperately plead for action.

[ Image: Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, NewsHour screengrab. ]

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.

The Colorado Independent

Ruy May Rue the Day He Dismissed Independent Voters – And Their Bond With African Americans

Wednesday, March 21st, 2012

INDEPENDENTVOTING.ORG NETWORKS

  • Ruy the Day! A Review of Ruy Teixeira’s Review of The Swing Vote: The Untapped Power of Independents by Linda Killian (by Jacqueline Salit, Huffington Post) Wow! For a man (actually, make that a MAN) who has devoted his political career to resuscitating a Democratic Party governing majority (he co-wrote The Emerging Democratic Majority in 2002), you would think he’d be a little more cautious about denouncing independents. Otherwise, his hoped for majority may get another slam, as it did in 2010 when independents expressed their disappointment and frustration with President Obama’s inability to conquer the partisanship in Washington, including the partisanship of his own party. Ruy might rue the day he tried to tear down Killian and the volatile movement-in-the-making she writes about.
  • LINDA KILLIAN OUTBREAK: The Uses of Polarization (By THOMAS B. EDSALL, NY Times/ The Opinion Pages/ Campaign Stops) At the same time, the percentage of the electorate that can accurately be described as independent — without partisan allegiance — has shrunk to about 7 percent, according to Ruy Teixeira of the Brookings Institution. While the importance of such voters has diminished, in a closely balanced contest these relatively uninvolved men and women have the power to determine the outcome: in the 12 presidential elections from 1964 to 2008, four – 1968, 1976, 2000 and 2004 – have been decided by 2.5 percentage points or less.
  • Historic Bond Ties African-Americans and Independents Together (LETTER The Hankster, by Bob Friedman, PHOTOS online) Last week I joined Rev. Al Sharpton and the National Action Network on the march from Selma to Montgomery. I am one of the 40% of Americans who are independent of both of the major parties. Back in the days of Ross Perot, the media called guys like me “angry white men.” Along the route, I spoke with many people and brought greetings from Dr. Lenora Fulani, the country’s leading African American independent with whom I’ve worked closely and from IndependentVoting.org, the country’s largest organization of independent voters of which I’m a part.
  • YOUR VIEW: Independent voters disfranchised in many states because of parties (Bob Friedman, Letters from our readers By Letters from our readers, Alabama.com) I want to respond to and applaud the Your Views letter “Alabama’s closed primary infringes on voters’ rights” in the March 10 Birmingham News by sharing the following. I couldn’t agree more that since we pay for the primaries, they should be nonpartisan, more like “top two” as they have in California.
  • The black vote: 5 states where Obama needs a big African-American turnout (By Perry Bacon Jr.,The Grio) President Obama’s campaign will likely need the kind of strong black turnout he received in 2008 to win re-election, particularly if some of the white independent voters who backed him four years ago opt for the Republican candidate because of frustration over the president’s tenure.

The Hankster

Report: Colorado oil, gas regulators ‘inadequate,’ not enforcing rules

Tuesday, March 20th, 2012

A new report blasts the state agency charged with regulating the oil and gas industry for failing to enforce its own rules.

There were 516 spills in 2011 but the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) only assessed five fines, according to the report that Earthworks released today.

“The COGCC’s mission is to foster responsible oil and gas development by balancing drilling with protection of landowners, public health, and the environment,” Gwen Lachelt, the director of Earthworks’ Oil & Gas Accountability Project, said in a prepared statement. “Right now, the COGCC’s rules, like its mission statement, are just empty words on a page. There is no balance here.”

Western Slope residents took to the X Games in Aspen this winter to promote stronger rules for oil and gas drilling in Colorado. (Photo by Eric Allen)

As the number of wells drilled increases in Colorado, the number of inspections is decreasing, the report found, noting it is physically impossible for existing COGCC staff to annually inspect every well. The report also claims many rule violations are not recorded. The few who are penalized are subject to maximum fines of ,000 per day, which the report deems “inadequate to deter irresponsible operations.”

“There is always room for improvement in anything that we do,” Colorado Department of Natural Resources spokesman Todd Hartman said on behalf of COGCC. “At the same time, the issues addressed in the report today are not simple. We are and will continue to be aggressive in our enforcement when operators take actions that pose significant threats to the environment and public health.” COGCC’s staff, he added, “works diligently, responsibly and effectively to ensure protection of the public and environment from any potential impacts of oil and gas development in Colorado. We enforce the most comprehensive set of oil and gas regulations in the country, including, beginning April 1, the strongest and most transparent hydraulic fracturing chemical disclosure rules yet adopted in any state.”

The Earthworks report comes amid heated debate about whether local governments should be able to make their own laws regarding oil and gas drilling. Competing bills — one introduced by a Democrat to empower local governments and another one introduced by a Republican to solely empower COGCC — died at the state capitol. Gov. John Hickenlooper recently convened a task force to help clarify and better coordinate” the regulatory jurisdiction between state and local governments.

The task force’s findings are due April 18.

Boulder County, Longmont and Colorado Springs have temporarily halted drilling activity. Commerce City, Erie and Aurora, Arapahoe County, Douglas County, Elbert County, El Paso County and Huerfano County are vying for their own regulations.

The proliferation of hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” is fueling much of the community concern.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is studying the risks that fracking poses to drinking water after complaints have been made in Colorado, Wyoming and other states.

This week the University of Colorado-Denver School of Public Health announced that an analysis of residents in Garfield County living within a half-mile of oil and gas fracking operations found they have been exposed to air pollution five times above the federal hazard limit.

U.S. Reps. Diana DeGette and Jared Polis, both Democrats from Colorado, have asked President Obama to strengthen environmental and public health standards to protect against fracking.

“COGCC’s inadequate performance shows why citizens need to have federal standards, as well as state regulations,” Earthworks’ policy director Lauren Pagel said. “In Colorado’s case, state regulation means inadequate regulation, and therefore, irresponsible development.”

She recommended that COGCC increase its inspection staff, standardize and publicize inspections, and increase fines for violations.

COGCC has doubled its staff size over the past seven years during hard economic times, responded Hartman, and the agency will hire an additional seven people, including two more inspectors, over the next fiscal year at a time when government agencies continue to cut budgets.

Moreover, COGCC’s website is “perhaps the most open and informative in the country, with wholesale public access to documents associated with complaints, inspections and alleged violations – as well as all follow-up documents that follow from those,” Hartman noted. “We publish updated statistics monthly on a wealth of material, including violations, complaints, spills, remediation and inspections.”

Still, critics remain.

Last month, 18 conservation and citizen activist groups questioned the ties between industry and regulators at the COGCC and asked Hickenlooper to improve the state’s oversight.

The Earthworks report is just the latest to question Colorado’s ability to regulate the energy industry.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission last week criticized the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment for its oversight of radioactive materials. State officials strongly defended their processes and called the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s comments “unprofessional.”

The Colorado Independent

DeGette joins critics blasting Romney for attack on Planned Parenthood

Thursday, March 15th, 2012

Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette, head of the congressional pro-choice caucus, joined with Democrats around the country in criticizing Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney for vowing to “get rid” of funding for Planned Parenthood if he were elected in November.

“Mitt Romney’s declaration that he would ‘get rid of’ Planned Parenthood is yet another dangerous and reckless attempt to score points with the far right at the expense of the health of millions of women,” DeGette said in a release.

“Planned Parenthood provides critical and necessary health services like annual exams, cancer screenings, and family planning for three million women across this country, and in some places their clinics provide the only care for hundreds of miles…. So today it’s clear once again that Mr. Romney’s ideas are too extreme for our nation and the women of America will not stand idly by while he threatens their health care.”

Democrats seized on remarks Romney made during an interview with St. Louis TV station KDSK, mostly reacting to the idea that Romney was seeking to eliminate Planned Parenthood altogether. Yet, it seems clear from context, the candidate was talking about “getting rid of” federal funding for the organization. His language is ambiguous, however, and KDSK teased the story with a suggestive headline: “Mitt Romney: Planned Parenthood, we’re going to get rid of that.”

Romney was answering a question about which programs he would cut to reduce government spending.

“Of course you get rid of Obamacare, that’s the easy one, but there are others. Planned Parenthood, we’re gonna get rid of that. The subsidy for Amtrak, I would eliminate that. The National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, both excellent programs, but we can’t afford to borrow money to pay for these things.”

In a call with Colorado reporters today, Obama for America Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter made reference to Romney’s remarks, characterizing them as part of a pattern that exposes Romney as a pandering candidate who is driving moderate voters farther away each day the GOP primary continues.

“He is trailing Obama by 18 percent among women and today he says he wants to get rid of Planned Parenthood,” she said. “Women in Colorado don’t share Romney’s vision of America.”

Last month, Colorado affiliates of the national breast cancer group Komen for the Cure made news for successfully pushing back against efforts by anti-abortion members of the national management team to end Komen funding for Planned Parenthood clinics here.

DeGette lauded the Colorado Komen leaders at the time and referred to those events in her release today.

“In recent weeks women have come together to stand up for Planned Parenthood and the important role it plays in their health and their community,” she said.

[Image: Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette, C-Span screenshot ]

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.

The Colorado Independent

I’m An Independent – Can I Vote in Super Tuesday’s Republican Primary?

Tuesday, March 13th, 2012

Alaska - Open Primary: Parties select who may vote in their primaries. To vote in the GOPprimary, a voter must be registered as a Republican 30 days beforeElection Day.

Georgia - Open: No party affiliation required at registration. However, on ElectionDay, voters must declare an oath of intent to affiliate with theparticular party for whom they are voting on Election Day.

Idaho - Closed: Until 2011, all Idaho primaries were open. Independents intervened in a lawsuit brought by a faction of the Republican Party seeking to close their primaries. However, the GOP obtained adeclaratory judgment that mandating open primaries violated freedom ofassociation and was thus unconstitutional in Idaho Republican Party v. Ysura. Subsequently, the legislature passed a bill allowing parties to choose which type ofprimary they use. Democrats have chosen a semi-closed primary;unaffiliated voters may register a party at the polls on election day,but they are bound to that party affiliation at the next election.

Massachusetts - Semi-Closed: Affiliated voters must vote in the primary of their party; however, unaffiliated voters may vote in either primary.

North Dakota – Closed: The only state without voter registration. To vote in the Republicancaucus you must have affiliated with the Republican Party in the lastgeneral election or intend to do so in the next election.

Ohio - Closed: Voters’ right to vote in the primary may be challenged on the basisthat they are not affiliated with the party for whom they are voting inthe primary.

Oklahoma - Closed: Only voters affiliated with a particular party may vote in its primary.

Tennessee - Open: No party affiliation required at registration. 

Vermont - Open: No registration by party. For presidential primary, voters must declare which ballots they want.

Virginia - Open: No party affiliation required at registration.

source: FairVote

The Hankster

college of the city of new york

Monday, March 12th, 2012

The Hankster

Ken Wolski for Senate – New Jersey Greens Meet March 17

Friday, March 9th, 2012

The Green Party of New Jersey (GPNJ) will be holding its 16th annual state convention, Saturday, March 17, 9:00 a.m.- 4:30 p.m., at the Rutgers Labor Education Center in New Brunswick.
The convention will hear from all three candidates seeking the Green Party presidential nomination: Roseanne Barr and Kent Mesplay (via Skype) and Jill Stein (in [...]
Green Party Watch

Colorado county clerks baffled by Gessler ‘non-citizen voter registration’ claims

Friday, March 9th, 2012

“I really have no idea what he is talking about,” Republican Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Sheila Reiner told the Colorado Independent.

Reiner was referring to allegations made again recently by Secretary of State Scott Gessler that non-citizens are registered to vote in the state. Reiner said she has asked Gessler in the past to share what he knows so that she and the other clerks in the state can address any potential problem. She said that, in roughly the year that has passed since he first brought up the issue, details from Gessler’s office have not materialized.

“I asked for the lists when I first heard about this. I haven’t gotten any information. I just don’t know,” she said.

Gessler shared more detailed information on the topic last month at an Arapahoe County Republican Men’s Club fundraiser. He said that 150 or so non-citizen residents of the state who had been erroneously registered to vote contacted him before he had even become secretary of state and asked to be removed from the registration rolls. He said that in 2011, his first year in office, 400-some erroneously registered non-citizens had asked to be removed from the rolls, the climbing number, he said, clearly indicates a wider and more serious problem.

This week, Gessler told KLZ talk radio listeners not only that non-citizens were being registered to vote in the state but that they were also casting votes.

“We’re continuing to do the analysis on the issue… of non-citizens being on the voting rolls here in Colorado and some of them voting,” he said. “We did a study last year and we’re going to do some more analysis and come up with more evidence to show people that there, in fact, are problems here in Colorado.”

At the end of last month, the Colorado Independent asked the secretary of state’s office to elaborate on his concerns and findings for the record but received no response.

The Independent then filed an open records request (pdf) with the office asking for any communication conducted between non-citizens registered to vote and the secretary’s office and/or conducted between the secretary’s office and county clerks on the subject of non-citizens asking to be removed from the voter rolls.

Secretary of State spokesman Rich Coolidge responded to say his office “is not the custodian” of such records. “You’ll need to submit your request directly to the county clerk and recorders, who register and cancel voter records,” he wrote in an email.

Voter rights watchdog group Colorado Common Cause subsequently submitted a similar records request and told the Independent that Coolidge had asked for an extension on the three-day statutory delivery period.

County clerks and staff contacted by the Independent so far in some of the state’s most populous counties, including Adams, Boulder, Denver and Pueblo, have said that they, like Reiner in Mesa County, have no knowledge of any non-citizens ever being registered to vote nor have they knowingly received any requests to be removed from the voter rolls from non-citizen residents of the state.

The Colorado Independent today submitted another open records request asking for any related “work product” created or commissioned by the secretary’s office, including any database searches seeking information concerning non-citizens being registered to vote in Colorado.

A standard form

“There’s nothing on the form like that,” Adams County Clerk Karen Long told the Colorado Independent, referring to the state’s standard “Withdrawal of Colorado Voter Registration (pdf)” form, the one available online that anyone seeking to remove their name from the rolls must submit to their county clerk. (Click on the image to the right for an enlarged version.)

“[The form] doesn’t ask anywhere for the reason you want to be removed,” Long said. “It asks for your name and ID or social security number and then you have to affirm it–you have to sign it and affirm it’s what you want and it’s accurate. That’s it. The only time we would know why someone wants to be removed is if they tell us, voluntarily. Maybe they’re moving out of state,” Long said.

Reiner said people sometimes come into her office upset about politics in general and want to be removed from the rolls.

Joan Fitz-Gerald, the highly respected former Jefferson County clerk, state senate president and now president of nonprofit watchdog AmericaVotes, said occasionally people asked her to remove them from the rolls because they were looking to avoid jury duty.

Boulder Clerk Spokesman Brad Turner didn’t hesitate to let on he was baffled.

“I don’t know how [Gessler] would know whether non-citizens were asking to be removed from the lists. That information just isn’t here, as far as I can tell.”

‘No need for a bill’

Gessler pushed hard last year at the state legislature for the “Proof of Citizenship” bill sponsored by Rep. Chris Holbert, R-Parker, and Sen. Ted Harvey, R-Highlands Ranch. The bill came in response to a study Gessler conducted based on database search and comparisons that he said suggested thousands of non-citizens could be voting in Colorado.

The bill, HB 1252, would have granted the secretary power to “periodically check” voter registration records against a collection of databases “maintained by federal and state agencies.” If the secretary suspected any registered voter “may not be a citizen,” he could suspend that voter’s registration, giving him or her 90 days to (re)submit documents proving their right to vote.

The bill failed to pass but, as the Colorado Independent reported in January, Gessler waved off Holbert and Harvey this year, saying there was “no need for a bill,” according to a Holbert staffer, because he felt he could address the issue outside the halls of the capitol with means available to him through his office.

Trimming voter rolls based on database searches like the ones described in the “Proof of Citizenship” bill– searches centered on comparing ID numbers listed in the state’s voter registration database, known as SCORE, and ID numbers listed in databases that include state or federal immigration information– is a prospect that alarms voting-rights watchdogs and at least some of the state’s county clerks, who openly doubted the accuracy of such an approach.

Clerks said that conducting those kind of database searches would give Gessler numbers of likely “suspects” but no confirmation that the people he thinks he is dealing with are actually the ones tied to the information on his lists. They added that he wouldn’t know whether people’s citizenship status had changed or to what extent human error had fouled up his searches.

That kind of skepticism has been the reaction among government watchdogs since Gessler first began talking about non-citizen voters.

Estelle Rogers, director of advocacy for Project Vote, looked closely at the six-page report Gessler produced last March that started the conversation in the state. In the report, Gessler said his office, working mainly from the Department of Revenue driver’s license database, was “nearly certain” that 106 immigrants were improperly registered to vote in Colorado. The report concluded that perhaps as many as 11,805 people were improperly registered to vote in the state and that 4,000 of them had voted in the 2010 elections.

Rogers told the Colorado Independent that such claims should come with more detailed supporting material that could be independently reviewed.

“The secretary says he is ‘certain’ that 106 people on Colorado’s voter roll of 3.7 million are ‘improperly registered.’ That’s about 0.0028648648649 percent of the voter roll,” she wrote in an email. “Obviously such an error rate is to be expected whenever human beings are copying data from one list to another. Before the secretary of state jumps to the conclusion that these are 106 cases of voter fraud, he should have a lot more evidence than mere suspicion. Non-citizen voting is a fashionable political theme these days, but it has no basis in reality. And the right to vote is too important to confuse with sloganeering.”

Fitz-Gerald echoed those sentiments.

“Clerks know that you never do anything without documentation. There are very specific processes outlined by law when you’re dealing with voter registration. There has to be a paper trail.”

She said that accuracy and accountability is everything when it comes to removing voters from the registration lists.

“You have to be sure that somebody isn’t removing someone else’s name. It can be very basic. Neighbors could be fighting.”

Fitz-Gerald pointed as a cautionary tale to the error-ridden “scrub lists” controversial Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris used in 2000 to purge voter rolls there of alleged felons. Roughly 173,000 names made it onto Harris’s list but many of the names were tied to people with only misdemeanor convictions, others merely shared the same name with a felon.

Florida tried to rectify the problem as the errors came to light but evidence from Election Day polling places suggest thousands of legally registered voters may have been turned away as a result of the purge.

‘This matters’

“If I’m a clerk in Colorado, I wanna know who are these people [Gessler] is talking about. I wanna know what he’s doing. I’d be camping out in his office,” said Fitz-Gerald. “This matters. This is important.”

A high-profile conservative politics election and campaign finance attorney for years before he took office, Gessler has drawn heat for pushing election rules changes that he says are necessary to prevent voter fraud and that critics contend would make it more difficult for many legally registered Coloradans to cast votes. In addition to seeking the power to independently purge the voter rolls of suspected noncitizens, Gessler sued to prevent clerks from mailing ballots to inactive voters.

His efforts reflect moves Republicans have made nationwide since the GOP “wave election” of 2010 to stiffen voting requirements, efforts watchdogs and Democrats characterize as attempted vote suppression of left-leaning constituencies, including young people and members of minority groups.

Given that context, Fitz-Gerald says you would expect Gessler to be taking greater pains to justify his proposals.

“He’s not just a partisan attorney anymore,” she said. “He’s in a much different role. He’s an officeholder responsible to all voters– Republican, unaffiliated and Democratic. If something is wrong with the voter registration system, it is his responsibility not just to call it out at party dinners but to fix the problem and to work with the clerks to do that. It has to be a collaborative effort to keep the system solid.

“If he’s right there’s a problem, then it’s a state problem and it’s tied to the public trust. So take it to the clerks. Let’s get it worked out. You either want to solve the problem or you don’t. There are laws about how you go about these things and for good reason, too.”

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.

The Colorado Independent

Video of Virgil Goode’s Announcement of Presidential Candidacy

Thursday, March 8th, 2012

Virgil Goode recently announced his candidacy for the presidency of the United States in 2012 in New York City. This video does not capture the entire thing, and the wind obscures a bit of the sound, but the basic idea is there.

Virgil Goode Announces Presidential Candidacy

If anyone has the full video, please share it.

Blogger PostDiggDeliciousEmailFacebookFarkFriendFeedGoogle BookmarksGoogle GmailLinkedInRedditStumbleUponSlashdotShare

Independent Political Report

NO results from Massachusetts Green Party Primary yet

Thursday, March 8th, 2012

With 95% of precincts reporting, boston.com and other Massachusetts media outlets have reported NO results yet of the Massachusetts Green-Rainbow Party Presidential Primary as of 11 p.m. Eastern.
Despite the fact that Obama was on the Democratic Party ballot uncontested, and Romney was declared the Republican victor with only 3 precincts (of 2,054) reporting, Massachusetts [...]
Green Party Watch