Archive for February, 2011

A Parable of America

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Parable: The British are Coming! Oh, wait.

Once upon a time, I went to Philadelphia, and I couldn’t sleep. I took a walk, and, blogging from the “guest” computer by the checkin desk in the wee hours of the morning, I wrote …

Flag at Independence Hall, Philadelphia
(photos: Hart Williams)

3 AM In Philadelphia

July 16, 2008

Long flights, long days. Can’t sleep: still on West Coast time.

After a five hour nap, I catch the last three innings of the 15-inning All Star Game. Not much to write home about, but it’s something.

I walk the six blocks to Independence Hall, which is completely deserted. I get there right at 3 AM, and while I’m standing outside the cattle gates (decorated with bunting), staring up at the venerable old place, the night guard approaches. We don’t have anything to do, so we talk.

Guarding Independence Hall

He’s originally from Brooklyn, but grew up in upstate New York. Lives in New Jersey now, but took the job, because it pays better than Jersey law enforcement jobs. The economy in Jersey’s “not too good, but it’s pretty bad everywhere.”

He’s working for a “vendor” Wackenhut, who has the contract to guard our national treasure. The National Park Service fellows are inside, but the subcontractors are outside, getting chewed up by mosquitos. He can’t afford the gas to drive anymore, and they’re “upping the bridges” which seems to translate as “increasing tolls.”

They’re trying to form a union, but Wackenhut doesn’t like it. The guy who is organizing “is just trying to help out the other guys.” They don’t get any benefits, health, retirement, etc. They had a big meeting at Christ Church. Ed Rendell and other bigwigs were there, but nothing’s come of it.

Guarding the Liberty Bell, across the street

They don’t give much allowance for winter gear, and the raincoats they issue are so thin and cheap that they tear at the slightest provocation.

The guy who was trying to organize the union was just suspended, the guard tells me. He hopes that they’ll get a union, but he can’t see where it’s going anywhere.

Then his shift replacement shows up, and he rotates to another station. “Take care,” he tells me.

“You too,” I say.

Where the Declaration and Constitution were hammered out

And this is how our liberty is honored at the home of the Declaration and the Constitution.

Rent-a-cops with no benefits, private subcontractors guarding “liberty” — as cheap as possible, while the NPS people doze inside the Great Building.

Land of the Free, Home of the Brave.

Washington statue outside of Independence Hall

But no unions, dammit: Freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose.

Courage.

~ July 16, 2008
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Rodeway Inn

Back to 2011.

It’s a lot worse than I thought.

Wackenhut finally reached an agreement with SEIU on December 16, 2008, five months to the day after I’d talked to the night watchman. It was the end of a long, ugly battle, that included Wackenhut filing RICO racketeering suits against SEIU and the City of Los Angeles, among others.

But Wackenhut is not exactly the same Wackenhut that was contracted to “privatize” security at the Independence National Historic Park.

Here’s an item from 2007:

Philadelphia, Pa. (Vocus) September 13, 2007 — Six years after the World Trade Center was attacked in New York City, security officers who guard Philadelphia historic sites testified about their poor working conditions at a community field hearing held yesterday, September 12. The hearing was chaired by Congressman Robert A. Brady (D-PA) at Christ Church Community House just blocks from the Independence Hall and Liberty Bell sites.

Security officers who guard the Liberty Bell and Independence Hall National Park raised concerns with the panel regarding training, equipment, health and safety and workers? rights. Wackenhut Services Inc., a division of Wackenhut/G4S, the foreign-owned security services company, employs the security officers….

What? A “foreign-owned security services company”??

Yup. The Palm Beach Post explains:

Wackenhut has new HQ, new ID
By JEFF OSTROWSKI
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 8:57 p.m.
Friday, Feb. 18, 2011

… The Wackenhut empire began modestly. In 1954, George Wackenhut started a detective agency in Coral Gables. A couple of years later, he expanded into security guard services, and the company mushroomed.

Wackenhut Corp. was publicly traded for years, as was a separate prison company, Wackenhut Corrections. In 1995, Wackenhut moved its corporate headquarters to Palm Beach Gardens from Coral Gables.

In 2002, Danish security firm Group 4 Falck bought Wackenhut Corp., and in 2004 Group 4 Falck and Securicor combined to create G4S. The Wackenhut name survived until this month….

Yes. Wackenhut is no more. Only G4S remains.

Wait a minute? A BRITISH firm is guarding INDEPENDENCE HALL???!!? The “Birthplace of the United States of America”??!?

Washington Statue from above  @ left

Yeah. Wackenhut was bought up, along with its contract first by a Danish firm, and then by a British company, who then fought a vicious (losing) battle to keep American workers from their American right to collective bargaining.

All in the shadow of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

Webpage header for Wackenhut, now G4S.

G4S “Government” webpage

Take a minute to let that sink in.

Your tax dollars at work. Literally.

So, the Redcoats are guarding Independence Hall?

The chair from which Washington presided at the constitutional
convention, now guarded by Redcoat security.

Yup.

Breathes there an American with a soul so dead that s/he is not profoundly and deeply insulted by this, I cannot hope to help. But I don’t want to ever be stuck in the same room with ‘em. Symbolism MATTERS, dammit, else why bother preserving that valuable downtown Philly real estate in the first place?

And that’s pretty much a parable for modern American life, taken from REAL life™.

Greed, ideology and blindness allowed Independence Hall and the Liberty Bell to be guarded under a “privatization” contract by a British security firm.

The Redcoats are coming! The Redcoats are coming!

Oh, wait.

They’re here.

Courage.

 

The Democratic Daily

Kissing up to Boston

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Aerosmith sold more records, New Kids on the Block sold more lunch boxes and Boston named itself after our…

Home – BostonHerald.com

Lee Wrights: Opposing war doesn’t make you a pacifist

Sunday, February 27th, 2011

Emailed to contact.ipr@gmail.com and posted at Liberty for All:

by R. Lee Wrights

“The only defensible war is a war of defense.” – C.K. Chesterton

One of the most misunderstood principles of libertarianism is the non-aggression principle. The belief that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being for any reason whatsoever; nor advocate the initiation of force, or delegate it to anyone else including government is the very essence of the non-aggression principle. The misconception starts when we use the phrase “initiation of force.” People tend to focus on the last word and ignore or forget the first.

Most libertarians are not pacifists so our adherence to the non-aggression principle doesn’t mean we won’t defend ourselves. On the contrary, the right to self-defense is inherent in the concept of self-ownership. It is absolutely necessary for every individual to be prepared always to defend him or herself. Your life is too precious to trust it to the hands of strangers.

There seems to be similar confusion with the understanding of the theme of this exploratory campaign – stop all war. That theme was chosen based on the feedback and comments I’ve been hearing from Libertarians across the nation for the past several years. They are asking why the Libertarian Party isn’t out front in the anti-war movement. The questioning was particularly strong and passionate from many of the young people who were delegates to the 2010 national convention in St. Louis.

Since 9/11, I’ve been asking that same question everywhere I have gone and to everyone I’ve met, including members of the Libertarian National Committee, rank-and-file members of the Libertarian Party and fellow patriots in the libertarian movement. It became clear to me that if the message to stop all war was going to become the message of the Libertarian Party as it should be, someone had to step up to make it happen.

That being said, let me be clear. I am not at war, but make no mistake – I am still a warrior. I am not a pacifist – but I don’t have to kill someone to prove it. I don’t oppose anyone using force to defend themselves, their homes, their property, or those they love. If you doubt me when I say that, just try breaking into my house. Self-defense is a part of life, and it’s sometimes necessary for people to defend themselves in order to survive.

But whatever force is used should be quick and precise and the amount of force used should be limited to stopping the attack. Once you have stopped the attack, self-defense does not give you the right to bludgeon the attacker further. Nor does self-defense give you the right to attack someone because you think they may attack you in the future, no matter how boisterous their threats.

Nations should conduct their wars by the same rules. If a nation is attacked, it has the right to defend itself using whatever force is necessary, and using all the power at its disposal to stop the attack quickly and decisively. It may be necessary–on occasion–to invade the aggressor nation. But once the aggressor has been defeated, the defending nation has no right to maintain an occupation force or engage in “nation building.” The cause of national defense does not give any nation the right to conduct a preemptive or preventive war, a policy Dwight Eisenhower called an invention of Adolf Hitler.

While most libertarians strongly support the non-aggression principle, we aren’t pacifists. While we defend the right of individuals, or nations, to use force in self-defense, we adamantly reject any justification for a nation to wage a war of aggression for any reason, under any circumstances. The call to stop all war is simply the logical and systematic application of the non-aggression principle to all areas of government activity. It is a call to stop any activity that involves the use of force not to defend rights, but to impose the State’s will on others.

All libertarians share this core value. All libertarians believe in the message of peace and non-aggression. That’s why I believe that the Libertarian Party must embrace the message and not be afraid to boldly, loudly and unequivocally proclaim now and in the 2012 presidential election – stop all war.

Call it pro-peace or anti-war, they both mean the same thing – stop all war. We have chosen to call for stopping war because that is what the members of the LP have been asking for. We remember how the George W. Bush crowd co-opted the pro-peace slogan to justify sending an invasion force into Iraq. The American people were told it was a war of peace. Of course, it was a lie.

As I said

in late 2002 before we sent troops to Iraq, “It is blasphemy to kill innocent people and have innocent people do your killing for you, all the while proclaiming to the world you are doing it in the blessed name of Peace.” This is why Libertarians understand that we must call for stopping all war. Stop all war is a message that cannot be co-opted and used to justify sending more young people far from home to die.

The Libertarian Party isn’t the entire libertarian movement. It’s only the political arm of the movement. The Libertarian Party represents the larger libertarian movement in the political arena. Without us, Americans have no way of voting for liberty and freedom at the ballot box on Election Day. We in the movement who have made the decision to engage in electoral politics have chosen ballots over bullets in a peaceful attempt to bring about badly needed reform of a government that no longer serves the people but rather has fallen into the hands of tyrannical nannies who wage war on and enslave the very citizens they have sworn to serve.

So I echo the words of my brother Thomas Hill. The message of this campaign is a message all libertarians can and should embrace – stop all war. This is the cause the Libertarian Party must champion in 2012. If we don’t, nobody else will. To spread that message across the country, we’ll need the help of anyone who desires to be free and who opposes tyranny in any form.

-30-

R. Lee Wrights, is a libertarian writer, activist and lifetime member of the Libertarian Party who lives in Texas. He is considering seeking the presidential nomination because he believes the Libertarian message in 2012 should be a loud, clear and unequivocal call to stop all war. Wrights has pledged that 10 percent of all donations to his campaign will be spent for ballot access so that the stop all war message can be heard in all 50 states. He is the co-founder and editor of the free speech online magazine Liberty for All.

http://www.wrights2012.com

Blogger Post Digg Delicious Email Facebook Fark FriendFeed Google Buzz Google Bookmarks Google Gmail LinkedIn Reddit Shoutwire StumbleUpon Slashdot Share

Independent Political Report

Stand with teachers

Sunday, February 27th, 2011
Real fiscal responsibility does not come at the expense of our working families.

Yet all over this nation, extreme tea party politicians are using the economic crisis as an excuse for advancing radical proposals. But these right-wing lawmakers are not attacking the budget, they’re attacking the fundamental rights of working people.

The battle is coming to Tennessee.

Without swift and bold action from people like you, our teachers stand the threat of having their voices silenced.

Tell your state legislators: I stand with teachers.

Show your solidarity with Tennessee teachers and working people across the nation. Here’s how you can get involved:

Sign The Petition: The Tennessee Democratic Party has a petition supporting teachers’ rights that will be sent to the state legislature.

Attend A Rally: There’s a noon rally at the state capitol in Nashville on Saturday, Feb. 26. Several groups, including the Tennessee Education Association, are hosting rallies. Learn more at our online action page.

Let us send this message to extreme tea party politicians: Our elected leaders should be creating jobs—not attacking workers.

This is a critical moment. The time to stand up is now.

Share/Bookmark

TN Democratic Party News

Oil and gas industry gears up to fight loss of tax breaks–by throwing money at politicians

Saturday, February 26th, 2011

The oil and gas industry’s largest trade group will begin direct contributions to political candidates as it ramps up for a fight over the Obama administration’s proposal to cut billions in tax breaks for energy companies.

“This is adding one more tool to our toolkit,” Martin Durbin, API’s executive vice president for government affairs, told Bloomberg in an interview. “At the end of the day, our mission is trying to influence the policy debate.”

Energy company giving has been heavily weighted toward Republicans.

Oil and gas companies and groups with political committees, such as the Washington-based Independent Petroleum Association of America, gave about 77 percent, or .6 million, of their total contributions for 2009-2010 to the Republican party, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Oil and gas companies were the 15th largest source of political contributions leading up to the 2010 election.

Koch Industries Inc. was the industry’s largest contributor, giving .79 million to candidates, more than 90 percent of whom were Republicans. Exxon, which gave .33 million to congressional campaigns, was the second largest. More than 80 percent of Exxon’s money went to Republicans.

Pat Garafalo at Climate Progress writes that API’s move toward direct political contributions is especially troublesome because in addition to lobbying for the industry, it runs committees that set standards for the oil industry.

In its official report, the commission that investigated the BP oil spill found that API was too “compromised” to be setting industry standards. “Because they would make oil and gas industry operations potentially more costly, API regularly resists agency rulemakings that government regulators believe would make those operations safer, and API favors rulemaking that promotes industry autonomy from government oversight,” the commission found.

Colorado Independent

For Charlie Sheen, question is ‘Two’ be or not to be

Saturday, February 26th, 2011

Charlie Sheen will be heading back to the set of “Two and a Half Men” next week. Problem is, there isn’t going…

Home – BostonHerald.com

Seeking The Truth, Let Rolling Stone do the Interview

Friday, February 25th, 2011

We all know that big business can wave a fistfull of money at a senator and change his mind.     Now we find out specially trained PSY-OPS troops can manipulate their thoughts with the presentation of controlled materials.     What we have been reluctant to ask is  “How hard do you have to twist the truth to get over on a senile old warrior like John McCain?”     We have all seen Johnny have one of his old age fits and deny facts and reality. Would any man with a functional mind dump Sarah Palin on America?

                           You are such a manly man Joe.

Those reportedly singled out in the  “information operations” campaign included Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz.; Joe Lieberman, I-Conn.; Jack Reed, D-R.I.; Al Franken, D-Minn.; and Carl Levin, D-Mich.     Other diplomats and think-tank analysts were also targeted.     The Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 was passed by Congress to prevent the State Department from using propaganda techniques against U.S. citizens.      This law seems not to be followed and as of yet there is no protection against politicians selling out for money and other favors from big business.

How can we the people elect someone to go to Washington and represent our interest?     Is such a thing possible any longer and if someone discovers a way to do this how long will it be before the Supreme Court strikes it down and returns control of everything to big business?


This type of thing begs the question of why the military and most of our politicians are so hell bent on perpetual war?     They keep the fear machine going 24/7 and constantly tell us there is no other option.     No progress is made and lives and money are spent fighting for what exactly?      War is and always has been big business.

In the above photo Gen. David Petraeus is attempting to use mind control on John McCain and failing due to McCain’s advanced years.     John is so old he can’t control his own mind.

Gen. David Petraeus has ordered an investigation into claims that a top Army official instructed a military team to manipulate visiting U.S. dignitaries using  “psychological operations”  so they would approve more resources for the Afghanistan war.     Our country is so broke we can’t pay teachers and cops and somebody is running an illegal PSY-OPS operation to get more war money.     Its time to shut the defense contractors down.

Rolling Stone reported that the command of Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, who is in charge of training Afghan troops, tried to tap members of the military’s  “information operations”  unit to use their skills on visiting senators and congressmen, among others.     The goal, according to the article, was to convince the officials to provide more troops and money.


Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan said Thursday that the investigation will seek to determine whether the actions taken were inappropriate or illegal and will conclude they weren’t.     For some reason I see a cat in a sand box and the cat is very busy.


Lapan, while not offering any denial of the claims, said it’s not unusual for “psy-ops” personnel to be asked to do things outside their normal duties.     For instance, it would not be inappropriate for Caldwell to ask one of the officers in the unit to get data on visiting congressional delegations.    We do this on a frequent and regular basis.    The critical question concerns what information was being gathered and how it was intended to be used.

The Rolling Stone article centered on allegations by Holmes, a leader of the “information operations”  unit.     He said Caldwell was looking for more than typical background information about visiting senators.      Holmes told the magazine the office wanted a “deeper analysis of pressure points we could use to leverage the delegation for more funds.”


A senior U.S. military official whose unit deals with “psy-ops” said Holmes was not officially trained by the Army in this kind of warfare.     Is the key phrase not officially trained by the Army? Does that mean the CIA trained him or some other as yet unknown government agency or just that the Army familiarized him with the techniques but did not officially train him?



The amazing thing here is that the military still grants interviews to Rolling Stone Magazine since they end up revealing all kinds of messy truths to RS.     It appears the writer for Rolling Stone has some special OPS training of his own and the ability to make the military put its combat boot in its own mouth.      Seriously the military should be embarrised to be so easily done in by its own words.      Here’s the key to their bad luck, lying is harder than it at first seems so you must keep it a secret in the first place.
All of the politicians said they were unaware of any pressure or trickery being used on them however Joe Lieberman and John McCain said they could read the serial number on a fifty dollar bill from a football field away.     They also stated that everytime they saw a brown paper bag their hearts skipped a beat until they could get a peek at what was inside.



Here’s a brainwashing tip.     On old codgers like Joe and John knock the dust and spider webs off them first.     After that success is just a soft soaping away.


Here’s a snippit of the published story.


A high-ranking U.S. General in Afghanistan illegally ordered psychological operations officers to influence political figures, Rolling Stone’s Michael Hastings reports.

Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, the man charged with the training of the Afghan government’s troops, ordered a group of  “information operations”  specialists led by Lt. Colonel Michael Holmes to help influence visiting Senators and Congressmen and garner more political support for the unpopular war.      Holmes tells the magazine that when he and his fellow intelligence officers resisted the order, Caldwell’s staff and military investigators set out to ruin their careers.


“My job in psy-ops is to play with people’s heads, to get the enemy to behave the way we want them to behave,”  Holmes says.     “I’m prohibited from doing that to our own people.     When you ask me to try to use these skills on senators and congressman, you’re crossing a line.”      An officer attached to another psy-ops team in Afghanistan agreed:   “Everyone in the psy-ops, intel, and IO community knows you’re not supposed to target Americans.     It’s what you learn on day one.”

If Senator AL were still on SNL he would have a blast with this story.      Al is amused by McCain sleeping on the senate floor.     Naps are the right of senators and it is the duty of the pages to wake them up to vote.

                 John is dreaming about being a maverick.

According to Holmes, his unit’s targets included Senators Jack Reed, John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Al Franken and Carl Levin;   Congressman Steve Israel of the House Appropriations Committee;  the Czech Republic’s ambassador to Afghanistan and Germany’s interior minister; and even Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Adm. Mike Mullen.

Holmes says that Caldwell, an ambitious three-star general, ordered him to profile members of visiting congressional delegations and provide  “deeper analysis of pressure points we could use to leverage the delegation for more funds.”      The general’s chief of staff also asked Holmes what they would need to  “plant inside their heads”  to get more troops sent to the country.


“We called it Operation Fourth Star,”   Holmes says.     “Caldwell seemed far more focused on the Americans and the funding stream than he was on the Afghans.     We were there to teach and train the Afghans.     But for the first four months it was all about the U.S. Later he even started talking about targeting the NATO populations.”


Federal law forbids the use of psychological operations on U.S. citizens, and every defense authorization bill includes a “propaganda rider”  reiterating the point.      Holmes also suspected that Caldwell’s orders were in violation of the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, passed by Congress to ensure that U.S. citizens would never become subject to Soviet-style propaganda campaigns. Col. Gregory Breazile, the spokesperson for Caldwell’s operation, disagreed with Holmes’ assessment.      “It’s not illegal if I say it isn’t!”      Holmes recalls Breazile shouting when the two discussed the legality of Caldwell’s order.

Caldwell’s chief of staff then launched an investigation of Holmes that reported the Colonel drank alcohol, dressed in civilian clothing, improperly tried to start a business, made jokes of a sexual nature (“LTC Holmes’ comments about his sexual needs are even more distasteful in light of his status as a married man”), and carried on an “ inappropriate” relationship with a Maj. Laurel Levine. According to the Maj. Levine, who has received 16 service awards in her 19 years with the military and has a spotless record, Caldwell’s vendetta against Holmes “will probably end my career.”      In civilian life this is dropping a dime on somebody, destroying an enemy with a mountain of charges that are hard to defend.      When you are accused of dressing in civilian clothing, having a drink and trying to start a business What Do You Say?


The whole experience has left Holmes seemingly heartbroken by the military he served in.     “My father was an officer, and I believed officers would never act like this,”   he says.     “I was devastated.     I’ve lost my faith in the military, and I couldn’t in good conscience recommend anyone joining right now.”


A spokesperson for Caldwell denied all of Holmes’ charges to the magazine.

ACVDN Bottom Line,  Lt. Gen. William Caldwell is on track for a quick return to civilian life.     I am amazed at how poorly these folks are at keeping secrets.     Beyond this incident the Rolling Stone Magazine has used their own loose lips to sink their boat before and there are hunreds of thousands of secret memos and emails floating around the net courtesy of WIKI Leaks.     It appears that if our top brass are ever captured by the enemy the whole story is just one talk with one reporter away from daylight.     Is this what all the tax money we send to the military buys?

The Two Obamas….The Two Obamas



Campaign Obama
“If American workers are being denied their right to organize when I’m in the White House, I will put on a comfortable pair of shoes and I will walk on that picket line with you as President of the United States.”

Whats wrong, can’t find your shoes?

President Obama
“Some of what I’ve heard coming out of Wisconsin, where you’re just making it harder for public employees to collectively bargain generally seems like more of an assault on unions.    And I think it’s very important for us to understand that public employees, they’re our neighbors, they’re our friends…… And I think it’s important not to vilify them or to suggest that somehow all these budget problems are due to public employees.”

This is lame and wimpish.    This is a man backing down and walking back his words.


Did you spot the difference in these two statements?

Campaign Obama is about action and taking a clear stance and working for a solution.

President Obama is just a lot of words and no follow thru.    Is this guy the Hot Air Kid?     If you couldn’t see the difference in the two statements how about the differences in the two photos?

Remember when Obama said,  ” I’d rather be a good one-term president than a mediocre two-termer.”     Who does Obama think

he’s kidding?     He is a medicore one termer at the moment and it will require some spine from him to rise above that level.


The First Lady ought to have a talk with the President and let him know the word good doesn’t go in a sentence with his name unless he puts it there.     To put it there he will have to do some work.

Living up as President to what he lipped off about while campaigning would go a long way toward improving Democrats thoughts about him.      Nothing he can do will make Republicans like him so any gesture in that direction is wasted effort.     Obama needs to concentrate on pleasing the Democratic members of the Democratic party.      They are the ones who got him elected the first time.      Without them there is no second time.

Let me take a crack at some new bumperstickers for Obamas next run.

“Disreguard My Words, They’re Just Hot Air”


“Forget What I said but Believe I Care”

“Yes I Could but Not For Union People” 

“I didn’t mean it then and I won’t do it now”

“I was running then, I’m elected now”

“Don’t Despair, Imagine I ‘m There”

President Obama, If You Want to become a laughing stock go for it.    I’m pretty sure you’ll make it.

ACVDN Bottom Line,  Sometimes you gotta rise to the occasion and deliver the goods.    Especially if your mouth has committed you.    A promise to a group of people at election time is not a statement you walk back with a finely crafted statement.    It is something you live up to.    What kind of joke do you want to be?

Amherst County Virginia Democratic News

Democracy in Egypt & America – the Beat Goes On

Friday, February 25th, 2011
KRESKY LATEST ARTICLE
  • Democracy and the Institutions of Democracy (Harry Kresky, Huffington Post) Significantly, the first institution the pundits call for in Egypt is political parties. But here in America the people are fed up with the role the parties are playing in our democracy.

ALSO IN THE NEWS:
There is a new mayor in Chicago, as Rahm Emanuel beat out six other candidates with 55 percent of the vote in a tactically perfect campaign.


Independents in Arizona are making politics difficult in The Grand Canyon State with a whopping 31.7 of total indies there; being responsible for a large chunk of the 7.5 percent dip for the GOP and 6.8 percent for the dems since 2001.

    OPEN PRIMARIES

    • Editorial: Politics getting more difficult (The Daily Courier) One thing is for certain: with more and more people abandoning the Republican and Democratic parties for independent status, it makes the job of the well-known parties that much more difficult.
    • Make U.S. Politics Safe for Moderates (William A. Galston, Senior Fellow, Governance Studies; Elaine Kamarck, Public Policy Lecturer, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University – BROOKINGS) The primary electorate is a small, unrepresentative portion of the overall electorate. In the highly visible 2010 election season, for example, only 7.5 percent of all voting-age Americans took part in congressional primaries — actually higher than in past years. This primary electorate is dominated by the parties’ base voters — which is not true in general elections. That’s why so many Americans say they are unhappy with their choices in November.
    • Chicago Votes in Emanuel as Mayor (BY: DAVID CHALIAN AND TERENCE BURLIJ, PBS NewsHour) Galston and Kamarck propose getting rid of the closed primary system, arguing it enables the extremes of both parties to determine the nominees. They instead call for open primaries, or as California now does, one primary for all the candidates, and have the top two finishers, regardless of party affiliation, face off in the general election.
    NATIONAL REFORM
    • National Popular Vote Plan Pushers Hire New Lobbyists, Bring on Deep-Pocketed Help (By Michael Beckel, Center for Responsive Politics/Open Secrets blog) National Popular Vote’s legislative proposal — which requires a state’s electors to cast their votes for the winner of the national popular vote instead of the winner of the state-wide vote — has been adopted in states representing about a quarter of the Electoral College.

    CONNECTICUT

    MONTANA

    • Supporting bison (By Ilona Popper, LETTER Helena MT Independent Record) Your “party lines” alienate Republicans, Democrats, and independent voters, like me.

    NEW YORK

    The Hankster

    Donate To The NBRA

    Thursday, February 24th, 2011

     

    DONATE TO THE NATIONAL BLACK REPUBLICAN ASSOCIATION

    You can help. 

    We have launched our 2011-2012 NBRA Youth Voter Education Campaign that will enlighten young people about the conservative values and rich civil rights legacy of the Republican Party, in time for the 2012 election.

    Our NBRA Youth Voter Education Tool Kit will be sent to Republican groups and our NBRA grassroots activists on college campuses around the country.  Included are our educational materials that have already proven to be very effective in opening the eyes of ordinary Americans, such as yourself.

    You can help pay the cost of printing and shipping the materials with donations in any amount by check or money order made payable to the National Black Republican Association and sent to: 

    National Black Republican Association
    4594 Chase Oaks Drive
    Sarasota, FL 34241-9183  

    The NBRA is an IRS Section 501(c)4 organization.  Donations are not tax deductible.

    Thank you in advance for your assistance with this important endeavor at this crucial time in our nation’s history. 

    Warm regards,

    Frances Rice
    Chairman
    National Black Republican Association
    www.NBRA.Info

    _________________________________


    About The NBRA

    Our vision is that black Americans will become power players in the political arena so that they can seize control over their own destiny and move into our ownership society through small business and home ownership.

    MISSION:  The mission of the National Black Republican Association (NBRA) is to be a resource for the black community on Republican ideals and promote  the traditional values of the black community which are the core values of the Republican Party:  strong families, faith in God, personal responsibility, quality education, and equal opportunities for all.

    GOAL:  The goal of the NBRA is to return black Americans to their Republican Party roots by enlightening them about how Republicans fought for their freedom and civil rights, and are now fighting for their educational and economic advancement.

    OBJECTIVES:  The objectives of the NBRA are to conduct a nationwide grassroots educational campaign in black communities; champion school choice opportunity scholarships to give black parents educational options and access to a quality education for their children; and provide training and resources for grassroots activists and candidates for elected office.  

     

    © National Black Republican Association, 2011. All Rights Reserved.

     

    BLACK REPUBLICAN: National Black Republican Association E-News

    The GOP & The Koch Brothers

    Thursday, February 24th, 2011

    The internets are buzzing tonight with the news that Wisconsin Governor Walker received a prank call today from Ian Murphy, 33, of Buffalo, who writes for a site called BuffaloBeast.com. Murphy was pretending to be prominent conservative donor David Koch. Koch, was “one of the biggest contributors” Walker’s election campaign. So obviously when money calls, Walker answers…

    It all looks very damning for Walker. Very damning. Walker was completely duped. Walker is completely in the pockets of the Koch brothers, and regardless of what he says to try to get out of this, he dug his own hole.

    Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University and a professor of economics was on The Last Word tonight discussing the relationship between David Koch, Wisconsin and the GOP:

    The media is finally catching on to the Koch connection in Wisconsin and other states where union busting is also in the works, Hart Williams wrote about it here on Monday and provided some in depth information. 

    Over at right wing blog, Powerline, John is whining that the left is waging a war against the Koch Brothers. Oh cry me a river…

    Stay tuned… We could see calls for Walker to resign now that he’s been caught with his hand in the Koch cookie jar.

    The Democratic Daily